We need to review the migration guide. Dejan did a good one. We need to review it now.
I’m actively working on making 2.7.0 out. If someone can help on that front it would be great. On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 12:47 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm not sure if there is enough information about user choices to > extrapolate a "trend," per se. My recommendation would be to look at the > features and performance you need now as well as those you expect to need > in the future and make a decision based on that. > > What exactly do you mean by, "...the 6.x migration will be based on > previously installed activemq brokers"? Artemis is a completely different > implementation than 5.x so the migration for existing users will include > new a new configuration format and a new message store. I don't see how > this can be effectively automated except perhaps for the simplest > configurations. If you think you will migrate to Artemis eventually then it > may be best to use it now to avoid the migration step later. > > > Justin > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:23 AM aferre <ferre.adr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to know what is the current "trend" on selecting artemis or > > activemq for new products. > > I can see the following : "The overall objective for working toward > feature > > parity between ActiveMQ 5.x and Artemis is for Artemis to eventually > become > > ActiveMQ 6.x." ( > > http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-artemis-roadmap.html).If > > I read this correctly, one should use activemq over artemis, and assume > > that > > the 6.x migration will be based on previously installed activemq brokers. > > Is > > that right? > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html > > > -- Clebert Suconic
