In my opinion only the most critical fixes involving security or stability
should be back-ported.

That said, I think we'd need more than just a single user here to warrant
the effort to back-port and perform releases. Of course, in an ideal world
the folks who actually need the fixes & releases would share the work-load.
That would make this whole endeavor more viable.

Lastly, it's worth mentioning that anybody can maintain their own branch
and perform their own releases using 2.19.0 as a base. If the demand isn't
high enough to warrant general releases I expect this is what we'd
recommend.


Justin

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:04 AM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I wonder what should qualify for the cherry picking.
>
> One thing I must ask.  To always use cherry pick -x
>
> I have a report tooling that would help to XREF the branches.
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:00 AM Viktor Kolomeyko
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I would like to cast my vote supporting 2.19.x branch for JDK 1.8 users.
> > We do have a version of our product which is still running on JRE 1.8 and
> > we do need some critical fixes to be applied.
> > In particular, I would want to see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3593 to be included into
> > 2.19.1
> > Many thanks,
> > Viktor Kolomeyko
> >
> > On 2021/12/15 17:27:26 Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > > I just sent ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20.0 to be reviewed under Vote. and I
> > > would like to clarify that JDK 1.8 will not be supported any more from
> > > Artemis 2.20.0
> > >
> > >
> > > At this point I don't think we need to create a 2.19.x branch for JDK
> > > 1.8 Users.
> > >
> > > I would like to hear from anyone who can't move to JDK 11 here ...
> > >
> > > Here is a space for your complaints if you can't move,  and I space
> > > for us to convince you to move out of JDK 8 :)
> > >
> > > I had a few conversations with many other teams and I don't foresee a
> > > reason to.. so, let me know if I'm wrong here.
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> > >
> >
> > R3 is committed to ensuring the security and protection of the personal
> > data that we process, and to provide a compliant and consistent approach
> to
> > data protection. Any personal data that is shared as part of any email
> > correspondence with R3 shall be processed in line with the R3 Privacy
> > Policy<https://www.r3.com/full-privacy-policy/>
> >
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>

Reply via email to