> Indeed, own Artemis releases will always be an option, but there are few > drawbacks I can see with this approach: > - It will be an unofficial release and clients who receive software with this > unofficial library will be naturally cautious about it; > - Since it will be a private release it will require an additional effort for > publishing it to MavenCentral or the like.
I'm not a lawyer, but as far as I know binary releases in apache terms is a facility for users, not really an official distribution. it's about "The source", not the binary. this goes on the warranty wording within the apache license.
