Domenico, Thanks for finding that one. Obviously, it has my vote now. And I'm glad that I can stop searching and experimenting for this...
e. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Domenico Francesco Bruscino <bruscin...@gmail.com> Verzonden: donderdag 19 mei 2022 11:41 Aan: users@activemq.apache.org Onderwerp: Re: permissions for temporary queues EXTERNAL SENDER: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe. EXPÉDITEUR EXTERNE: Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe à moins qu’ils ne proviennent d’un expéditeur fiable, ou que vous ayez l'assurance que le contenu provient d'une source sûre. Hi Erwin, your suspicion is right, the temporary-queue-namespace is only used for address-settings, but not for security-settings, see ARTEMIS-3692 [1]. [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3692__;!!AaIhyw!sndbMKxDclJf5TC3NBldW-MteNPbg8-5eEEo-4lWT97jH_39lr7eSQcmgxq1E4GPy6KMekVlLkBkCAG25FsN$ Regards, Domenico On Thu, 19 May 2022 at 11:27, Dondorp, Erwin <erwin.dond...@cgi.com.invalid> wrote: > Hello, > > A namespace exists for temporary queues so that address-settings can > be applied to temporary queues. > That namespace is configured using configuration parameter > "temporary-queue-namespace". > > In my setup, the security-settings are applied to very specific > patterns/prefixes only, so that no user has permissions on "#". > When my observation is correct, creating temporary queues always fails > unless "createNonDurableQueue" is granted to "#". > But that contradicts my careful organisation of permissions. > > I tried to configure security-settings using the value from > temporary-queue-namespace, but that seemed ineffective. > > My suspicion is that temporary-queue-namespace is only used for > address-settings, but not for security-settings. > Is that suspicion correct? > And, if so, is that really intended? > > thx, > Erwin >
