I don't think it's possible to know whether or not that was a conscious decision based on the available evidence. If it was, I would have expected a mention of it in the documentation, the commit log, or a code comment. I think the only conclusive data would be input from the original author (i.e. Martyn Taylor).
Aside from that, I'm not sure what you mean by "rewriteBatchedStatements is not JDBC conformant." I didn't see any mention of that detail in the linked documentation. It seems odd that the MySQL developers would put something which is "not JDBC conformant" in a JDBC driver. Can you clarify? Justin On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 8:19 AM Stephen Baker < stephen.ba...@rmssoftwareinc.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have looked over the use of executeBatch in artemis-jdbc-store and it > would be safe to use mysql’s rewriteBatchedStatements connection string > value the way the code is written right now. I was wondering if that was a > conscious decision given rewriteBatchedStatements is not JDBC conformant. > > > https://dev.mysql.com/doc/connector-j/8.0/en/connector-j-connp-props-performance-extensions.html#cj-conn-prop_rewriteBatchedStatements > > Stephen E. Baker >
