Hi,
/"the reporting performance of Artemis is significantly higher than
Classic"/
I'm very interested about such of reporting performance between Artemis
and AMQ.
Is it possible to share?
Regards,
François
On 26/09/2022 16:40, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Couple minor corrections for anyone else reading later..
On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 14:15, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
the major bit from the release (2) only tells you about the API. Currently
version 2 will be version 2 as long as we keep the API compatible with
previous releases. (When we make it 3.0 it means we can remove a few
deprecated methods and other stuff)
The second bit, 2.26.0 (26), means we had ** Twenty Six ** releases fixing
bugs and improvements since we released the very first 2.0 back in 2017:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/releases/tag/2.0.0
Due to 2.y.z releases as well, it is actually now 34 releases since 2.0.0.
ActiveMQ Artemis was initially donated from HornetQ, and back then we made
a roadmap for features we must implement to get the same features from
ActiveMQ. I believe at this point we are already beyond.. and that page
needs some updating probably to reflect the current state.
Also, to talk about production ready quality, the codebase of ActiveMQ
Artemis was donated to ActiveMQ back in 2017 from HornetQ. It is a very
stable codebase. I have myself dedicated the past 14 years of my profession
to this codebase... along other developers who I highly consider, and many
other open source contributors... So it is definitely production quality.
It was late 2014 for the donation, 2015 for the Artemis 1.0.0 release,
and then 2017 had the Artemis 2.0.0 release.
Talking about that, I'm releasing 2.26.0 today.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 6:12 AM Mark Johnson<mark.john...@flooid.com>
wrote:
Although Artemis is at Release 2, I cannot find a direct statement in the
online documentation that Artemis is production ready. In contrast, this
page suggests that Artemis is *not* production ready
https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-artemis-roadmap.
Naturally, I must provide evidence that Artemis is considered production
ready by the ActiveMQ team before investing any further effort in deploying
and testing Artemis to replace Classic.
We are considering Artemis simply because the reporting performance of
Artemis is significantly higher than Classic.
* Mark*
*Johnson*
Principal Product Architect
Flooid, PCMS House, Torwood Close
Westwood Business Park
Coventry, CV4 8HX, United Kingdom
T: +442475269508
M: 07764305692
E:mark.john...@flooid.com
* flooid.com<https://www.flooid.com/>*
*Click here to send me something sensitive or securely!
<https://sendsafely.pcmsgroup.com/u/Mark.Johnson%40flooid.com>*
[image: Download now]
<https://www.incisiv.com/playbook-unified-commerce-for-grocery-convenience-retail>
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail,
the use of this information or any disclosure, copying or distribution is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The views
expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be the views of Flooid Ltd and
should not be taken as authority to carry out any instruction contained.
Flooid Ltd reserves the right to monitor and examine the content of all
e-mails. Flooid Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with
company number 1459419 whose registered office is at PCMS House, Torwood
Close, Westwood Business Park, Coventry CV4 8HX, United Kingdom. VAT No: GB
705338743.
--
Clebert Suconic
