publishing a benchmark is a game without end.
It's always possible to get a particular usecase or tweak things in a way that will move the benchmark in any direction you want. the best you can do is to measure the use case you want to achieve yourself. I have spent a lot of time with benchmarks before and I don't want to get back to that game myself :) Having said that, we have an ./artemis perf client tool as part of the artemis cli that you can use for some metrics. On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:05 AM Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > /"the reporting performance of Artemis is significantly higher than > Classic"/ > > I'm very interested about such of reporting performance between Artemis > and AMQ. > > Is it possible to share? > > Regards, > > François > > > On 26/09/2022 16:40, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > Couple minor corrections for anyone else reading later.. > > > > On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 14:15, Clebert Suconic > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> the major bit from the release (2) only tells you about the API. Currently > >> version 2 will be version 2 as long as we keep the API compatible with > >> previous releases. (When we make it 3.0 it means we can remove a few > >> deprecated methods and other stuff) > >> > >> > >> The second bit, 2.26.0 (26), means we had ** Twenty Six ** releases fixing > >> bugs and improvements since we released the very first 2.0 back in 2017: > >> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/releases/tag/2.0.0 > >> > > Due to 2.y.z releases as well, it is actually now 34 releases since 2.0.0. > > > >> ActiveMQ Artemis was initially donated from HornetQ, and back then we made > >> a roadmap for features we must implement to get the same features from > >> ActiveMQ. I believe at this point we are already beyond.. and that page > >> needs some updating probably to reflect the current state. > >> > >> Also, to talk about production ready quality, the codebase of ActiveMQ > >> Artemis was donated to ActiveMQ back in 2017 from HornetQ. It is a very > >> stable codebase. I have myself dedicated the past 14 years of my profession > >> to this codebase... along other developers who I highly consider, and many > >> other open source contributors... So it is definitely production quality. > > It was late 2014 for the donation, 2015 for the Artemis 1.0.0 release, > > and then 2017 had the Artemis 2.0.0 release. > > > >> Talking about that, I'm releasing 2.26.0 today. > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 6:12 AM Mark Johnson<mark.john...@flooid.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Although Artemis is at Release 2, I cannot find a direct statement in the > >>> online documentation that Artemis is production ready. In contrast, this > >>> page suggests that Artemis is *not* production ready > >>> https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-artemis-roadmap. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Naturally, I must provide evidence that Artemis is considered production > >>> ready by the ActiveMQ team before investing any further effort in > >>> deploying > >>> and testing Artemis to replace Classic. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> We are considering Artemis simply because the reporting performance of > >>> Artemis is significantly higher than Classic. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> * Mark* > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> *Johnson* > >>> > >>> Principal Product Architect > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Flooid, PCMS House, Torwood Close > >>> > >>> Westwood Business Park > >>> > >>> Coventry, CV4 8HX, United Kingdom > >>> > >>> T: +442475269508 > >>> > >>> M: 07764305692 > >>> > >>> E:mark.john...@flooid.com > >>> > >>> * flooid.com<https://www.flooid.com/>* > >>> > >>> *Click here to send me something sensitive or securely! > >>> <https://sendsafely.pcmsgroup.com/u/Mark.Johnson%40flooid.com>* > >>> > >>> [image: Download now] > >>> <https://www.incisiv.com/playbook-unified-commerce-for-grocery-convenience-retail> > >>> > >>> The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the person > >>> or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > >>> privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, > >>> the use of this information or any disclosure, copying or distribution is > >>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please > >>> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The views > >>> expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be the views of Flooid Ltd > >>> and > >>> should not be taken as authority to carry out any instruction contained. > >>> Flooid Ltd reserves the right to monitor and examine the content of all > >>> e-mails. Flooid Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with > >>> company number 1459419 whose registered office is at PCMS House, Torwood > >>> Close, Westwood Business Park, Coventry CV4 8HX, United Kingdom. VAT No: > >>> GB > >>> 705338743. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic
