Hi Matt - I requested JIRA access on Monday of this week, so still awaiting
approval, once I have access to submit tickets I will do just that.

Thanks,
Arthur Rodriguez



On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 1:01 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Arthur-
>
> I’m not aware of it being reported. Please create a JIRA ticket with the
> detail on how to reproduce and we can look at working on a fix in an
> upcoming release.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> > On Sep 25, 2024, at 10:29 AM, Arthur Rodriguez <artrod...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Matt -
> >
> > We have tried using masterslave, it has no impact on the issueI am
> > describing in this post.
> > Broker Name not updated in Web Console Network Bridge Tab after failover
> of
> > Remote BrokerPlease see my original post and let me know if you are aware
> > of the issue being reported and weather or not there is a known solution.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Arthur Rodriguez
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 1:03 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Arthur-
> >>
> >> Would you please try this without using failover? Network Connectors
> >> reconnect by default, so you should not use the failover uri://.
> >>
> >> The masterslave:// prefix seems more what you are looking for-- one
> >> network bridge to one of the brokers listed in the comma separated list
> of
> >> uni’s.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/networks-of-brokers#NetworksofBrokers-MasterSlaveDiscovery
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Matt Pavlovich
> >>
> >>> On Sep 19, 2024, at 11:03 AM, Arthur Rodriguez <artrod...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We are running ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.1 in a Shared File System Master
> >> Slave
> >>> HA environment with multiple brokers networked in a hub spoke
> >> architecture.
> >>> Broker Failover is working as expected, however in the web console on
> the
> >>> network bridge tab, the Broker Name does not get updated after failover
> >> of
> >>> any remote broker, the ip address does get updated and messages are
> >>> properly transmitted to the current “Master” as expected.
> >>>
> >>> I understand that the Broker Name is obtained from metadata when the
> >>> original connection is made and may not be immediately updated in the
> >>> console when the network bridge reconnects to the new Master broker
> after
> >>> failover however it seems to me that there should be some way to
> refresh
> >>> the broker name.
> >>>
> >>> Here is the network bridge config we are using: <networkConnector
> >>> conduitSubscriptions="false" duplex="true" name="MY-BRIDGE"
> >> networkTTL="2"
> >>> uri="static:(failover:(tcp://201.me.net:61002,tcp://202.me
> >>
> .net:61002))?nested.wireFormat.maxFrameSize=104857600&amp;randomize=false&amp;maxReconnectAttempts=-1">
> >>> <staticallyIncludedDestinations> <queue physicalName="Q.A" /> <queue
> >>> physicalName="Q.B" /> <queue physicalName="Q.C" /> <queue
> >>> physicalName="Q.D" /> </staticallyIncludedDestinations>
> >> </networkConnector>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can anyone provide some insight on how we might be able to refresh the
> >>> Broker Name field without needing to restart the network adapter, which
> >>> might require a restart of the broker in the worst case scenario?
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@activemq.apache.org
> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
>
>
>

Reply via email to