I guess the hard part if figuring out how to do it. With Canoo WebTest, it was easy enough to use svn:externals to pull in the web-tests.xml (as well as login.xml and config.xml) from the src/test/resources directory of each web module.
If we want to allow the same setup for Selenium, we'd likely put the files in src/test/java/org/appfuse/webapp/selenium (or something similar). We could use svn:externals to pull these into the archetypes, but we'd have to retain the package names. For the basic archetypes, Maven will rename the package names, but not for the modular archetypes, so it seems to make better sense to hard-code these. Of course, if Maven can run tests in a JAR file, that might be a good solution (but it doesn't do much for IDE integration). On a related note, does anyone have any thoughts about an appfuse-junit dependency that includes all the Base*TestCase classes and dependencies? We'll probably eventually need to do this if we want to support TestNG and allow users to use JUnit. Then again, it's probably best to switch whole-heartedly and not support multiple testing frameworks. Matt On 5/31/07, Sanjiv Jivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I favor only supporting Selenium. I see no reason to support a testing framework like Canoo which is no longer a web testing best practice. Sanjiv On 5/31/07, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All, > > After getting Dojo's DropdownDatePicker working with both Struts and > Spring MVC, I've run into a snag: > > You can no longer use Canoo WebTest to enter dates in a form. > > It doesn't find the form element because HtmlUnit (the underlying > browser implementation for Canoo) doesn't understand/render Dojo's > components. > > For users, workarounds include: > > 1. Don't write tests for entering data on forms that have required dates. > 2. Don't make dates required. > > Either way, it seems logical to move to Selenium for UI testing. > > Thoughts? > > I plan to use Selenium's Java support to write the tests, so test data > will be part of JUnit reports, which is a nice side effect. Also, if > you start Cargo + Selenium RC up in the background, you'll be able to > run tests from your IDE. > > Is there anyone out there that'd like the option of WebTest or > Selenium? It's probably possible to support both, but I'd rather not. > Selenium is simply a better solution for the problem AFAICT. > > Thanks in advance for any comments. > > Matt > > -- > http://raibledesigns.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- http://raibledesigns.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
