On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 05:32 pm, TULK, Daniel, FM wrote: > fails because MX4J starts an RMI registry on port 1099. From MX4J docs I > see that the port it uses for its RMI registry is configurable but I can't > see a way of configuring that port in MX4JSystemManager.
It is not possible at this point in time. > I think what I'd really like to do is have the RMI adaptor register itself > with my JNDI server. Then I guess my next preferred option would be to > patch MX4JSystemManager so that the RMI registry port is configurable. I'd > be quite happy to submit such a patch. Fantastic. One thing though - the MX4JSystemManager will bind to registry *before* any applications are loaded. > c) Failing a) and b) where the instructions on how to submit a patch are See "Patches" on http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html -- Cheers, Peter Donald -------------------------------------------------- "An intellectual is someone who has been educated beyond their intelligence." -------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
