Could this be due to the link issue after the mac update? Wihtout more information, it's a shot in the dark, but who knows.
How to fix missing source for latest Java for Mac OS X 6 22<http://lookfirst.com/2010/10/how-to-fix-missing-source-for-latest.html> This will make clicking through to the JDK source work in Eclipse again after updating to the latest Java for Mac OS X. 1. Go to http://connect.apple.com and download *Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 3 Developer Package* 2. Install it. 3. Open a Terminal.app window 4. sudo -s 5. cd /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Home 6. ln -s /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0_22-b04-307.jdk/Contents/Home/src.jar . 7. ln -s /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0_22-b04-307.jdk/Contents/Home/docs.jar . http://lookfirst.com/2010/10/how-to-fix-missing-source-for-latest.html <http://lookfirst.com/2010/10/how-to-fix-missing-source-for-latest.html> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Antoine Toulme <[email protected]>wrote: > So what's the exact error message, and how did you update your JVM ? With > the usual Mac software update ? > > Thanks, > > Antoine > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:03, Ed Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks for getting back to me Alex, > > > > Nah, > > > > That's not it. :( > > > > $ $JAVA_HOME/bin/java -version > > java version "1.6.0_22" > > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_22-b04-307-10M3261) > > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.1-b03-307, mixed mode) > > > > $ buildr -V > > Buildr 1.4.3 > > > > $ uname -a > > ... Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0: Fri Apr 23 18:28:53 PDT 2010; > > root:xnu-1504.7.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 > > > > > > (I'm on a Mac.) > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Alex Boisvert <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > I think RJB will use JAVA_HOME to locate the JVM's native libs. Is > you > > > JAVA_HOME set correctly? > > > > > > You may also want to check rjb's home page for additional info. > > > http://rjb.rubyforge.org > > > (they do mention that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is needed but it's not; it may > help > > > though...) > > > > > > alex > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Ed Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, I recently updated my JVM. I am invoking the Java object to > check > > > that > > > > certain specified classes in config files can actually be > instantiated > > > from > > > > the path of the build. When I do that, I now get a missing JVM > > message, > > > and > > > > yet, Java is still in my path. > > > > > > > > Can you shed any light on this? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Ed > > > > > >
