I think this has to do with a dependency on rjb. If I attempt to install it manually with JAVA_HOME set it fails. $ sudo env JAVA_HOME=$JAVA_HOME ./install-osx.sh Installing the latest version of Buildr Building native extensions......... ........extconf.rb:40:in `open': No such file or directory - /Library/Java/Home/Home/include (Errno::ENOENT) from extconf.rb:40 ...
Gem files will remain installed in /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rjb-1.2.5 for inspection.... BUT "/Library/Java/Home/" is JAVA_HOME, *not* /Library/Java/Home/Home. For example, $ */Library/Java/Home/*bin/java -version java version "1.6.0_22" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_22-b04-307-10M3261) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.1-b03-307, mixed mode) If I create this fake directory, I find that it is trying to find jni.h. On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Ed Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > *** SIGH *** > > $ sudo ./install-osx.sh > Password: > Setting JAVA_HOME > Installing the latest version of Buildr > Building native extensions. This could take a while... > ERROR: Error installing buildr: > ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. > > /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/bin/ruby > extconf.rb > *** extconf.rb failed *** > Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of > necessary libraries and/or headers. Check the mkmf.log file for more > details. You may need configuration options. > > Provided configuration options: > --with-opt-dir > --without-opt-dir > --with-opt-include > --without-opt-include=${opt-dir}/include > --with-opt-lib > --without-opt-lib=${opt-dir}/lib > --with-make-prog > --without-make-prog > --srcdir=. > --curdir > --ruby=/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/bin/ruby > extconf.rb:40:in `open': No such file or directory - > /Library/Java/Home/Home/include (Errno::ENOENT) > from extconf.rb:40 > > > Gem files will remain installed in /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rjb-1.2.5 > for inspection. > Results logged to /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rjb-1.2.5/ext/gem_make.out > > ./install-osx.sh: line 52: buildr: command not found > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Ed Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I reinstalled XCode and uninstalled and reinstalled all my gems, but I >> can't get Builder to install, now. >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Ed Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> That didn't seem to work. >>> >>> The actual code that is triggering this error is pretty transparent even >>> though it involves a couple of user-defined clases. >>> Each declared dependency found is tested to see it is loaded by invoking >>> the Java object. >>> This is done when the jars have been packaged. >>> >>> def check_dependencies(build_context) >>> puts "Verifying custom service dependencies for vertical: >>> '#{build_context.vertical_key}'." >>> build_context.deps.each do |dep| >>> puts "Testing dependency: '" + dep.name + "' for class: '" + >>> dep.class + "'. Subclassing '" + dep.subclass + "'." >>> >>> Java.java.lang.Class.forName(dep.class).asSubclass(Java.java.lang.Class.forName(dep.subclass)) >>> end >>> end >>> >>> >>> This code is well tested, and just started failing. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Alexis Midon <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Could this be due to the link issue after the mac update? Wihtout more >>>> information, it's a shot in the dark, but who knows. >>>> >>>> How to fix missing source for latest Java for Mac OS X 6 >>>> 22< >>>> http://lookfirst.com/2010/10/how-to-fix-missing-source-for-latest.html> >>>> >>>> This will make clicking through to the JDK source work in Eclipse again >>>> after updating to the latest Java for Mac OS X. >>>> >>>> 1. Go to http://connect.apple.com and download *Java for Mac OS X >>>> 10.6 >>>> Update 3 Developer Package* >>>> 2. Install it. >>>> 3. Open a Terminal.app window >>>> 4. sudo -s >>>> 5. cd /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Home >>>> 6. ln -s >>>> >>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0_22-b04-307.jdk/Contents/Home/src.jar >>>> . >>>> 7. ln -s >>>> >>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0_22-b04-307.jdk/Contents/Home/docs.jar >>>> . >>>> >>>> >>>> http://lookfirst.com/2010/10/how-to-fix-missing-source-for-latest.html >>>> >>>> <http://lookfirst.com/2010/10/how-to-fix-missing-source-for-latest.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Antoine Toulme < >>>> [email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>> > So what's the exact error message, and how did you update your JVM ? >>>> With >>>> > the usual Mac software update ? >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > >>>> > Antoine >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:03, Ed Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > Thanks for getting back to me Alex, >>>> > > >>>> > > Nah, >>>> > > >>>> > > That's not it. :( >>>> > > >>>> > > $ $JAVA_HOME/bin/java -version >>>> > > java version "1.6.0_22" >>>> > > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_22-b04-307-10M3261) >>>> > > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.1-b03-307, mixed mode) >>>> > > >>>> > > $ buildr -V >>>> > > Buildr 1.4.3 >>>> > > >>>> > > $ uname -a >>>> > > ... Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0: Fri Apr 23 18:28:53 PDT 2010; >>>> > > root:xnu-1504.7.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > (I'm on a Mac.) >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Alex Boisvert < >>>> [email protected] >>>> > > >wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > > I think RJB will use JAVA_HOME to locate the JVM's native libs. >>>> Is >>>> > you >>>> > > > JAVA_HOME set correctly? >>>> > > > >>>> > > > You may also want to check rjb's home page for additional info. >>>> > > > http://rjb.rubyforge.org >>>> > > > (they do mention that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is needed but it's not; it >>>> may >>>> > help >>>> > > > though...) >>>> > > > >>>> > > > alex >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Ed Smiley <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > Hi, I recently updated my JVM. I am invoking the Java object to >>>> > check >>>> > > > that >>>> > > > > certain specified classes in config files can actually be >>>> > instantiated >>>> > > > from >>>> > > > > the path of the build. When I do that, I now get a missing JVM >>>> > > message, >>>> > > > and >>>> > > > > yet, Java is still in my path. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Can you shed any light on this? >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Thanks >>>> > > > > Ed >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >> >
