On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Ingo Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> So what IS the recommended way to install buildr? And should it not > actually install buildr somewhere in PATH by default? > The instructions provided on the site _should_ install buildr somewhere on the PATH (during "gem install buildr"). I don't know why they don't, or whether this only happens in some environments. (Last time I installed buildr on my Ubuntu 10.4 system, it worked fine) > Is installing RubyGems from source indeed the recommended way, even though > it might work with the Debian packages? > 'gem install buildr' is the recommended way for those who want an easy install. Installing from source involves more steps and requires additional environment dependencies. alex
