Not sure we documented that yet, but rvm is a nice alternative.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:44, Alex Boisvert <[email protected]>wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Ingo Schmidt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > So what IS the recommended way to install buildr? And should it not > > actually install buildr somewhere in PATH by default? > > > > The instructions provided on the site _should_ install buildr somewhere on > the PATH (during "gem install buildr"). I don't know why they don't, or > whether this only happens in some environments. > > (Last time I installed buildr on my Ubuntu 10.4 system, it worked fine) > > > > Is installing RubyGems from source indeed the recommended way, even > though > > it might work with the Debian packages? > > > > 'gem install buildr' is the recommended way for those who want an easy > install. Installing from source involves more steps and requires > additional > environment dependencies. > > alex >
