Hi You can use a custom expression to do the splitting and combined with the recipient list you can in your custom expression also determine where to message should be routed next.
See this unit test I added http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=821717&view=rev On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:56 AM, S. Ali Tokmen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello > > I'm trying to create a route which does the following: > > * Reads a file from the /input path, containing Java-property-like > entries. Let's assume it for example contains: > o p1 = x > o p2 = y > o p3 = z > o p4 = t > * Splits the file into two files and puts it into /output_2 and > /output_3 > o /output_2 should only receive the properties p1 and p2, e.g.: > + p1 = x > + p2 = y > o /output_3 should only receive the properties p1 and p3, e.g.: > + p1 = x > + p3 = z > * Once the writing of these files finished, move the original file > in /input into /backup > > I'm attaching some images for illustrating this. > > Now, here's the issue: when I do a route like the following: > > from("file:/input"). > to("direct:output_2", "direct:output_3"). > to("file:/backup"); > > from("direct:output_2").process(OnlyKeepPropertyProcessor("p1", > "p2").to("file:/output_2"); > from("direct:output_3").process(OnlyKeepPropertyProcessor("p1", > "p3").to("file:/output_3"); > > Then only p1 and p2 is passed to the process3, and the file in /output_3 > contains only p1. Worse, the backup only backs up what's in output_3... > > What is the good EIP for such a route? > > Thanks > > -- > > S. Ali Tokmen > [email protected] > > Office: +33 4 76 29 76 19 > GSM: +33 66 43 00 555 > > Bull, Architect of an Open World TM > http://www.bull.com > > -- Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
