Hello
Thank you for this brilliant example.
In my use case, I've used the Expression for only creating a recipient
list, each of them with direct: destinations, and then some other routes
starting from these direct: endpoints.
It works well and the routes are easy to read.
Cheers
S. Ali Tokmen
[email protected]
Office: +33 4 76 29 76 19
GSM: +33 66 43 00 555
Bull, Architect of an Open World TM
http://www.bull.com
Claus Ibsen a écrit :
Hi
And notice I use org.apache.camel.Message objects as container for the
answer to return in the custom Expression.
I do this as I can then add the custom header with the destination for
the recipient list EIP.
If I do not do that then I may have to use the Content Based Router
afterwards and check the content where to route the message.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi
You can use a custom expression to do the splitting and combined with
the recipient list you can in your custom expression also determine
where to message should be routed next.
See this unit test I added
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=821717&view=rev
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:56 AM, S. Ali Tokmen <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to create a route which does the following:
* Reads a file from the /input path, containing Java-property-like
entries. Let's assume it for example contains:
o p1 = x
o p2 = y
o p3 = z
o p4 = t
* Splits the file into two files and puts it into /output_2 and
/output_3
o /output_2 should only receive the properties p1 and p2, e.g.:
+ p1 = x
+ p2 = y
o /output_3 should only receive the properties p1 and p3, e.g.:
+ p1 = x
+ p3 = z
* Once the writing of these files finished, move the original file
in /input into /backup
I'm attaching some images for illustrating this.
Now, here's the issue: when I do a route like the following:
from("file:/input").
to("direct:output_2", "direct:output_3").
to("file:/backup");
from("direct:output_2").process(OnlyKeepPropertyProcessor("p1",
"p2").to("file:/output_2");
from("direct:output_3").process(OnlyKeepPropertyProcessor("p1",
"p3").to("file:/output_3");
Then only p1 and p2 is passed to the process3, and the file in /output_3
contains only p1. Worse, the backup only backs up what's in output_3...
What is the good EIP for such a route?
Thanks
--
S. Ali Tokmen
[email protected]
Office: +33 4 76 29 76 19
GSM: +33 66 43 00 555
Bull, Architect of an Open World TM
http://www.bull.com
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
