erh wrote:
>
> Well, I guess I actually *didn't* try w/o transferExchange param present
> at all before. oops. If I remove that, things work ok, at least with a
> seda queue. I'm trying it with an activemq queue now.
>
yep, it works fine with an activemq too. I looked at the jms page again
(http://camel.apache.org/jms.html) and it clearly says that transferExchange
is for Camel 2.0 only. I have no idea how I missed that before. :( Oh
well, at least I got it working now.
The DeadLetterChannel code looks like it got refactored for Camel 2.0, and
I'm not setup to test things against 2.0, so I don't know if it would
swallow exceptions the same way 1.6.2 does.
eric
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/dead-letter-channel-never-delivered-to-the-uri-tp25756520p25812863.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
