I think Andreas is looking for exactly the opposite. I don't think the goal of the direct: component was that endpoints would be shared across camel context (as that's what vm: has been written for). So i'm kinda tempted to consider that a bug.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 13:27, Adrian Trenaman <trena...@progress.com> wrote: > Fraid not! > > If you want to cross camel contexts in the same JVM, you could use the Camel > VM (http://camel.apache.org/vm.html) component to do this. Or, you can take > a look at using the NMR in SMX4 to achieve something similar. > > Hope that helps, > Ade. > > On 03/06/2010 12:19, ankelee wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Is it possible to have direct endpoints that will not be shared across >> different camelcontexts in the same JVM? So that each camel context has >> its >> own instance of a direct route? >> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
