Yikes - Guillaume, you're right - I misfired on this one.
By default, each direct: endpoint should be 'isolated' within it's own
camel context. So, if Andreas is experiencing something different, where
direct: endpoints from different contexts are being shared
'cross-context' then this would be a bug.
/Ade
On 03/06/2010 12:32, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think Andreas is looking for exactly the opposite.
I don't think the goal of the direct: component was that endpoints
would be shared across camel context (as that's what vm: has been
written for).
So i'm kinda tempted to consider that a bug.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 13:27, Adrian Trenaman<trena...@progress.com> wrote:
Fraid not!
If you want to cross camel contexts in the same JVM, you could use the Camel
VM (http://camel.apache.org/vm.html) component to do this. Or, you can take
a look at using the NMR in SMX4 to achieve something similar.
Hope that helps,
Ade.
On 03/06/2010 12:19, ankelee wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to have direct endpoints that will not be shared across
different camelcontexts in the same JVM? So that each camel context has
its
own instance of a direct route?
