Hello Ashwin, hello Bengt! Thanks for your responses and the 2 cents :o) Is it not confusing to provide exchange pattern in Camel which are not supported (or differ from the spec), isn't?
However, I think Ashwin you have more experience with Camel than I. Can you (or somebody else) recommend whether a processor/type converter/... should write the response into the in or out message? Or should this depend on the exchange pattern (write the response into the out message if the exchange out capable otherwise into the in message)? Or should the processor/... throw an exception, if it receives an exchange which is not out capable and the processors responsibility is to change the message? My understanding of In-Only was a fire and forgot (I don't expect a response). And I totally agree with Bengt, that this should be documented in the WIKI (also how the pipeline works and the messages are copied from out to in) or in the Camel in Action book. Cheers, Christian -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Exchange-Patters-tp2836060p2837443.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
