Can they be run in parallel - or can modules be run in parallel - that could speed things up.
2011/5/5 Christian Schneider <christian.schnei...@sopera.com> > I think it is only named wrong. The camel test support is written to > support integration > tests not unit tests. > > I think it is a very good idea to write real unit tests and integration > tests. The unit tests are extremly fast and give you a first security. Still > the integration tests are very important as many errors can only be spotted > this way. > > I think at the moment camel uses a quite pragmatic test concept. Each > component comes with unit tests and integration tests. As long as the tests > are fast I think there is no big problem with that. > > All in all the problem is though that a whole camel build takes aroung 4 > hours. So we might really be able to do that better. A problem here is > though the big number of components we have. > > Christian > > > Am 05.05.2011 10:56, schrieb Gert Villemos: > > Some would argue that a unit test per definition tests the unit completely >> standalone. Using JUnit this is easy, especially when combined with >> Spring, >> i.e. you can isolate your bean and test each method directly. >> >> The Camel Junit on the other hand test the unit as part of a camle route. >> Even if the route is very simple such as >> >> <route> >> <from uri="direct:in"/> >> <to uri="bean:myBean"/> >> <to uri="mock:out"/> >> </route> >> >> Still, It's testing my bean in a context that is more than just using the >> bean methods. >> >> The Camel in Action book 'only' list on benefit of using Camel Junit >> tests, >> namely simplification of the unit tests. I would like to hear what the >> rest >> of you do / think. >> >> - Do you use only Camel Junit tests using routes? >> >> - Do you use 'normal' method oriented JUnit tests for low level tests of >> individual methods combined with Camel Unit tests for >> 'component/application' level testing? >> >> - Do you see a conceptual problem in unit testing using Camel JUnit? >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Conceptual-correctness-of-using-Camel-Unit-Tests-tp4372286p4372286.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > CXF and Camel Architect > SOPERA - The Application Integration Division of Talend > http://www.talend.com > > -- -- David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen
