FYI created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4503 for the
recipient list bug and Achim is trying out another approach to workaround
this issue.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>wrote:

> I did take a look at the sources and I think I found the
> root of my problem, though I'm not sure how to get around it:
>
> RecipientList class contains a producer cache,
> in this cache the RecipientListProcessor class does store the
> endpoints depending on the uri as key.
> Now since only my header changes I don't know how to get around this.
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance, Achim
>
> 2011/9/29 Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>:
> > Ok,
> >
> > some more worrying details.
> >
> > Right now I have two Remote Hosts
> > After a successful run on Host A a second run is done (not parallel
> > but sequential) on Host B.
> > And I'm able to see that the header.address is set to host B still I
> > see that the request is made on Host A.
> >
> > Is this intentional, are there any ways of not "remembering" which
> > call did go to which Host?
> >
> > Thanks again, Achim
> >
> > 2011/9/29 Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> using Camel 2.8.0 I'm having the following scenario.
> >> I'm using the CXF for connecting to a couple .NET Webservices.
> >>
> >>        <!-- CXF config -->
> >>        <cxf:cxfEndpoint id="productionServer"
> >>
>  serviceClass="net.testservices.productionservice._2011_07.IService"
> >>                endpointName="s:basicHttpProductionService"
> serviceName="s:ProductionService"
> >>                wsdlURL="classpath:/wsdl/_1.wsdl" xmlns:s="
> http://tempuri.org/";
> >>                xmlns:a="
> http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/Arrays";
> >>                xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
> >>                <cxf:properties>
> >>                        <entry key="dataFormat" value="POJO" />
> >>                </cxf:properties>
> >>                <cxf:outInterceptors>
> >>                        <ref bean="loggingOutInterceptor" />
> >>                </cxf:outInterceptors>
> >>        </cxf:cxfEndpoint>
> >>
> >>
> >> Now I have a route for looking up some data in the DB for example also
> >> looking for a free
> >> WebService to call:
> >>
> >>                <camel:route id="pollQueue">
> >>                        <camel:from
> uri="timer://pollQueueTimer?fixedRate=true&amp;period=30000" />
> >>
> >> ... do preparation ....
> >> ... also set the address of the remote host into the header of the
> exchange ...
> >> ... call the "production" route ...
> >>
> >>                                        <camel:to uri="seda:production"
> />
> >>                </camel:route>
> >>
> >> the production route does call the Webservice on the available remote
> >> host as follows
> >>
> >> ... again a couple of preparations beforehand ....
> >>
> >>                        <!-- Altering Body to contain no data -->
> >>                        <camel:setBody>
> >>                                <camel:mvel>[ ]</camel:mvel>
> >>                        </camel:setBody>
> >>
> >>                        <!-- service call -->
> >>                        <camel:setHeader headerName="operationName">
> >>
>  <camel:constant>ProduceData</camel:constant>
> >>                        </camel:setHeader>
> >>
> >> ... the address of the remote webservice was previously added to the
> >> header in the starting route ...
> >>
> >>
> >> ... I needed to set the parallelProcessing to true, if not everything
> >> fails because the Timer Route tries to start another recipientList ...
> >>
> >>                        <camel:recipientList parallelProcessing="true">
> >>
>  
> <camel:simple>cxf:bean:productionServer?address=${header.address}</camel:simple>
> >>                        </camel:recipientList>
> >>
> >> ... some more calls checking data, errorhandling  and so forth ....
> >>
> >>
> >> Now the following happened to me when I had more than one Remote Host
> >> available:
> >>
> >> Calls to Host A did run on Host B
> >> Results expecting to be retrieved from Host A where polled from Host B.
> >> Now I wonder if the calls to certain Methods are cached or if the
> >> "re-running" timmer route does
> >> interfere somehow with the already running route.
> >>
> >> A Complete run of a route can take up to about 30 Minutes after that
> >> the "Production"-Route is done.
> >> Since there are multiple hosts available we want to do parallel
> processing.
> >>
> >> Any hints are welcome,
> >>
> >> Achim
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> --
> >> *Achim Nierbeck*
> >>
> >>
> >> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> >> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> >> Committer & Project Lead
> >> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > *Achim Nierbeck*
> >
> >
> > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> > Committer & Project Lead
> > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> *Achim Nierbeck*
>
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer & Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Jon
---------------
FuseSource
Email: j...@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: jon_anstey
Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen

Reply via email to