The suggested workaround by Jon really does the trick.
instead of using the recipientlist inside the spring route:
<camel:recipientList parallelProcessing="true">
<camel:simple>cxf:bean:productionServer?address=${header.address}</camel:simple>
</camel:recipientList>
I used a std. bean which looks like the following:
public class WebServiceRecipientListBean {
@RecipientList(parallelProcessing=true)
public String route(@Header("address") String address) {
if (address == null)
return null;
return "cxf:bean:productionServer?address="+address;
}
}
This pretty much did the trick.
Thanks a lot for the fast help and regards, Achim
2011/9/29 Jon Anstey <jans...@gmail.com>:
> FYI created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4503 for the
> recipient list bug and Achim is trying out another approach to workaround
> this issue.
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Achim Nierbeck
> <bcanh...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> I did take a look at the sources and I think I found the
>> root of my problem, though I'm not sure how to get around it:
>>
>> RecipientList class contains a producer cache,
>> in this cache the RecipientListProcessor class does store the
>> endpoints depending on the uri as key.
>> Now since only my header changes I don't know how to get around this.
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Thanks in advance, Achim
>>
>> 2011/9/29 Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>:
>> > Ok,
>> >
>> > some more worrying details.
>> >
>> > Right now I have two Remote Hosts
>> > After a successful run on Host A a second run is done (not parallel
>> > but sequential) on Host B.
>> > And I'm able to see that the header.address is set to host B still I
>> > see that the request is made on Host A.
>> >
>> > Is this intentional, are there any ways of not "remembering" which
>> > call did go to which Host?
>> >
>> > Thanks again, Achim
>> >
>> > 2011/9/29 Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>:
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> using Camel 2.8.0 I'm having the following scenario.
>> >> I'm using the CXF for connecting to a couple .NET Webservices.
>> >>
>> >> <!-- CXF config -->
>> >> <cxf:cxfEndpoint id="productionServer"
>> >>
>> serviceClass="net.testservices.productionservice._2011_07.IService"
>> >> endpointName="s:basicHttpProductionService"
>> serviceName="s:ProductionService"
>> >> wsdlURL="classpath:/wsdl/_1.wsdl" xmlns:s="
>> http://tempuri.org/";
>> >> xmlns:a="
>> http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/Arrays";
>> >> xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
>> >> <cxf:properties>
>> >> <entry key="dataFormat" value="POJO" />
>> >> </cxf:properties>
>> >> <cxf:outInterceptors>
>> >> <ref bean="loggingOutInterceptor" />
>> >> </cxf:outInterceptors>
>> >> </cxf:cxfEndpoint>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Now I have a route for looking up some data in the DB for example also
>> >> looking for a free
>> >> WebService to call:
>> >>
>> >> <camel:route id="pollQueue">
>> >> <camel:from
>> uri="timer://pollQueueTimer?fixedRate=true&period=30000" />
>> >>
>> >> ... do preparation ....
>> >> ... also set the address of the remote host into the header of the
>> exchange ...
>> >> ... call the "production" route ...
>> >>
>> >> <camel:to uri="seda:production"
>> />
>> >> </camel:route>
>> >>
>> >> the production route does call the Webservice on the available remote
>> >> host as follows
>> >>
>> >> ... again a couple of preparations beforehand ....
>> >>
>> >> <!-- Altering Body to contain no data -->
>> >> <camel:setBody>
>> >> <camel:mvel>[ ]</camel:mvel>
>> >> </camel:setBody>
>> >>
>> >> <!-- service call -->
>> >> <camel:setHeader headerName="operationName">
>> >>
>> <camel:constant>ProduceData</camel:constant>
>> >> </camel:setHeader>
>> >>
>> >> ... the address of the remote webservice was previously added to the
>> >> header in the starting route ...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ... I needed to set the parallelProcessing to true, if not everything
>> >> fails because the Timer Route tries to start another recipientList ...
>> >>
>> >> <camel:recipientList parallelProcessing="true">
>> >>
>> <camel:simple>cxf:bean:productionServer?address=${header.address}</camel:simple>
>> >> </camel:recipientList>
>> >>
>> >> ... some more calls checking data, errorhandling and so forth ....
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Now the following happened to me when I had more than one Remote Host
>> >> available:
>> >>
>> >> Calls to Host A did run on Host B
>> >> Results expecting to be retrieved from Host A where polled from Host B.
>> >> Now I wonder if the calls to certain Methods are cached or if the
>> >> "re-running" timmer route does
>> >> interfere somehow with the already running route.
>> >>
>> >> A Complete run of a route can take up to about 30 Minutes after that
>> >> the "Production"-Route is done.
>> >> Since there are multiple hosts available we want to do parallel
>> processing.
>> >>
>> >> Any hints are welcome,
>> >>
>> >> Achim
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> --
>> >> *Achim Nierbeck*
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> >> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> >> Committer & Project Lead
>> >> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > --
>> > *Achim Nierbeck*
>> >
>> >
>> > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> > Committer & Project Lead
>> > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> *Achim Nierbeck*
>>
>>
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> Committer & Project Lead
>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Jon
> ---------------
> FuseSource
> Email: j...@fusesource.com
> Web: fusesource.com
> Twitter: jon_anstey
> Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
>
--
--
*Achim Nierbeck*
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
