I opened the JIRA to track this [1].
I will also check with legal what possibilities we have to host the needed
dependency but not to include it. I would like to run/build the component
as all others and use mocks to test it.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5094

Best,
Christian

2012/3/6 Björn Bength <bjorn.ben...@gmail.com>

> Hi
>
> I forgot to open a JIRA for this.
> But what do you mean? No, we can't add the dependencies to a repo, but
> we can refer to a doc that describes what to do to add it to one's
> local repo.
> Maybe we can't include the component into camel-extra and have people
> build the entire stack of camel-extra components without messing with
> these jars, but there has to be a way of dealing with this sort of
> problems too, right?
>
> camel-manual-extra project :-)
> Or just use the project camel-hibersap from github and follow the
> instructions.
>
> regards.
> Björn
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can't it be added to the google project creating a repo in the source
> > repository?
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> >
> > 2012/3/5 Christian Müller <christian.muel...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> I think the problem is to add the dependency "org.sap/sap-jco/x.y.z" to
> an
> >> ASF maven repository. Without it, we cannot build this component.
> Because
> >> of this, I see no way to host this component at camel-extra. :-(
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Christian
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Christian Müller <
> >> christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> > This will make a few things easier for us and for our users.
> >> > Of course, we can host this component in camel-extra on googlecode,
> but
> >> we
> >> > often ignore/forget these components (the last version is 2.8.0). And
> I
> >> > think many of our users don't know that we also host some components
> >> > because of license reasons on camel-extra.
> >> >
> >> > I will checkout the code from github and play with it a bit...
> >> >
> >> > @Björn: If you are the owner of this contribution, could you please
> open
> >> a
> >> > JIRA for this new component and attach it (don't forget to grant the
> >> Apache
> >> > license). Than we could put it into camel-extra and start to work to
> >> > improve this component. And if Hibersap is licensed with a compatible
> >> > license, we can move it into our repo at Apache.
> >> >
> >> > Best,
> >> > Christian
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Erker, Carsten <
> >> > carsten.er...@akquinet.de> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Christian,
> >> >>
> >> >> yes, a colleague who is Apache member just explained it to me.
> >> >>
> >> >> We are discussing about switching to ASL 2.0 with the next version.
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >> Carsten
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Am 20.01.2012 um 10:36 schrieb Christian Schneider:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hi Carsten,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > you migth want to take a look at the Apache license policies:
> >> >> > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> >> >> >
> >> >> > LGPL is listed as excluded so it may not be used as a dependency
> of an
> >> >> apache product (as far as I understand).
> >> >> > I am not sure why it can´t be used but I guess some lawyer has
> helped
> >> >> with that policy.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Christian
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Am 20.01.2012 09:27, schrieb cerker:
> >> >> >> Björn, thanks a lot for sharing your camel-hibersap component. I
> only
> >> >> just
> >> >> >> started playing around with camel and liked it very much. Now
> there
> >> is
> >> >> a
> >> >> >> good reason to take a deeper look.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> It's good to hear that Hibersap helped you with your project.
> >> >> Regarding the
> >> >> >> license, I think there should be no problems to combine libraries
> >> that
> >> >> are
> >> >> >> under the Apache license and ones under LGPL (at least in their
> >> current
> >> >> >> versions). We initially liked the idea of a copyleft license and
> LGPL
> >> >> is the
> >> >> >> one most widely used. After all, I am not a lawyer and the big
> >> >> disadvantage
> >> >> >> of LGPL is that nobody seems to fully understand it and things are
> >> >> open to
> >> >> >> interpretation. Anyway, I'll have a talk with some people in my
> >> >> company who
> >> >> >> have a deeper understanding of OS licenses and we'll rethink the
> >> >> >> licensing....
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If you got any questions feel free to contact me via email or use
> the
> >> >> >> Hibersap forums or issue tracker on Sourceforge.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> >> Carsten
> >> >> >> (Founder of the Hibersap project)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Christian Schneider
> >> >> > http://www.liquid-reality.de
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Open Source Architect
> >> >> > Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to