My understanding is that ActiveMQ can serve as a host for JMS message queues, supporting applications that use them. Camel isn't meant as a host for JMS queueing as much as a listener to a JMS queue.
Don On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:34 PM, prasun.sultania <prasun.sulta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am a beginner. I have a very question to ask: > > Camel has got almost all the components described in EIP such as message > routing, Point to Point Channel and Publish-Subscribe channel. > > Still why do we need ActiveMQ when Camel has got everything? > What difference does ActiveMQ makes? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Difference-Between-ActiveMQ-and-Camel-tp5713797.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
