@Sully You mean to say is that, Camel provides an integration with message producer Application and the JMS Broker ActiveMQ? It acts as a bridge between the two, while providing Integration services defined in EIP and hiding the complexity of writing a JMS Client from scratch?
@Donald you mean that camel provides a better connectivity for message producers, and ActiveMQ has got better way of handling Consumers.I mean Camel can route a message from Consumer to JMS provider, but ActiveMQ can assure more reliable delivery of messages to consumers? On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:57 PM, sully6768 [via Camel] < [email protected]> wrote: > My short summary, > > ActiveMQ is an open source, enterprise messaging provider that conforms to > the JMS 1.1 specification. > > Camel is an open source integration framework. At its core it is an > implementation of Enterprise Integration > Patterns<http://www.enterpriseintegrationpatterns.com/>(EIP) by Gregor > Hohpe upon which numerous folks around the planet have > added integration consumer and producer extensions that provide the > connectivity options for the EIP message channels. > > As such, Camel would provide the integration layer to ActiveMQ in place of > hand writing the JMS clients. > > Does that help? > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Donald Whytock <[hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5713799&i=0>> > wrote: > > > My understanding is that ActiveMQ can serve as a host for JMS message > > queues, supporting applications that use them. Camel isn't meant as a > > host for JMS queueing as much as a listener to a JMS queue. > > > > Don > > > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:34 PM, prasun.sultania > > <[hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5713799&i=1>> > wrote: > > > > > > I am a beginner. I have a very question to ask: > > > > > > Camel has got almost all the components described in EIP such as > message > > > routing, Point to Point Channel and Publish-Subscribe channel. > > > > > > Still why do we need ActiveMQ when Camel has got everything? > > > What difference does ActiveMQ makes? > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Difference-Between-ActiveMQ-and-Camel-tp5713797.html > > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > -- > -- > Scott England-Sullivan > ---------------------------------- > FuseSource > Web: http://www.fusesource.com > Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com > Twitter: sully6768 > -- > Scott England-Sullivan > ---------------------------------- > FuseSource > Web: http://www.fusesource.com > Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com > Twitter: sully6768 > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Difference-Between-ActiveMQ-and-Camel-tp5713797p5713799.html > To unsubscribe from Difference Between ActiveMQ and Camel, click > here<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5713797&code=cHJhc3VuLnN1bHRhbmlhQGdtYWlsLmNvbXw1NzEzNzk3fDM2MTc2NDYwMw==> > . > NAML<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Difference-Between-ActiveMQ-and-Camel-tp5713797p5713801.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
