Is your issue related to this one? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5338
If it is, and you have to stick with a version < 2.8.0, you have to roll your own solution. You could e.g. make a deep copy of your body and work with this instance. Than the other routes are not affected for this change. Best, Christian On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:07 PM, PhilBurress <nmclough...@amig.com> wrote: > Why isn't the original "in" body of an exchange passed to a route under a > multicast? e.g.: > > > > The original "in" body in those subroutes ends up being the "in" body at > the > point the multicast is triggered. > > Is there anyway around this? We need to keep the original exchange "in" > body > as it was from the incoming queue in the subroutes. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Multicast-question-tp5716086.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
