Hi I have added an unit test that does netty request/reply async and uses the same channel to write the response back http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1394556&view=rev
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Flavio Magacho - M4U <flavio.maga...@m4u.com.br> wrote: > Ok Claus let me try to show you what I´m trying to do: > > <camelContext id="context-teste-claus" > xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint";> > <route> > <from > uri="netty:tcp://localhost:10022?textline=true&sync=true&reuseAddress=true&synchronous=false" > /> > <log message="reading ${bodyt}" /> > <to uri="activemq:readQueue" /> > </route> > <route> > <from > uri="activemq:writeQueue?concurrentConsumers=10&maxConcurrentConsumers=10" > /> > <setBody> > <simple>Echo: ${body.text}!</simple> > </setBody> > <log message="Writing ${body}" /> > <to > uri="netty:tcp://localhost:10022?textline=true&sync=false&reuseAddress=true&synchronous=false" > /> > </route> > </camelContext> > > And I want to write in the same socket that the messages arrives. > The idea is to make the message exchange process to be Async. > > I tried to use the Headers that you said, but they are not Serializable, so > I´ll need to write an endpoint based on the camel-netty and keep a hashmap > with the channel and a channel identifier as a key. I Should write this > identifier in the message properties and then, when it comes back, I´ll be > able to write it back in the same socket. Does it Makes sense to you? > > Thanks, > Magacho > > -----Original Message----- > From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com] > Sent: quinta-feira, 4 de outubro de 2012 03:30 > To: users@camel.apache.org > Subject: Re: Netty or Mina Async in the same socket > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Chad Beaulac <cabeau...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Flavio, >> >> You can't do what you're asking for using camel-mina or camel-mina2 at this >> point in time. >> > > He can grab the netty channel as its enriched on the message as a header. > Then use that channel to write the 2nd message back. He would need to code > that. Its a matter though where and when the 2nd message should be send back. > And what triggers when this should happen. > > Maybe you can tell us a bit more about what you do in a Camel route eg? > > from netty?sync=false > to ??? > > So you want at ?? something to process the incoming message, and use the same > socket to send back a reply message? > > >> Chad Beaulac >> Objective Solutions, Inc. >> www.objectivesolutions.com >> c...@objectivesolutions.com >> >> >> On Oct 3, 2012, at 9:35 AM, Flavio Magacho - M4U wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> My name is Flavio Magacho. >>> I have a specific problem: >>> >>> I´ll receive a socket connection and receive messages in this socket. >>> The point is to answer the messages, they should be send by the same socket >>> and we can’t use the sync option. >>> I tried to use Mina and Netty The only way I got to answer in the same >>> socket is to use the Sync option. >>> >>> Did anyone knows how to do that? >>> >>> Flavio Magacho >>> Gerente de Desenvolvimento >>> Diretoria de Tecnologia da Informação >>> M4U >>> +55 (21) 2546-4050 ▪ Ramal: 4082 >>> +55 (21) 8889-1572 >>> >>> þ Antes de imprimir, pense em sua responsabilidade e compromisso com o Meio >>> Ambiente. >>> O conteúdo desta mensagem é confidencial e pode ser privilegiado. É vedada >>> a sua cópia ou divulgação. >>> The contents of this message are confidential and may be privileged. >>> Copying or disclosing is prohibited. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > Email: cib...@redhat.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: davsclaus > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
