Typhus is the ri bus integrating with tomcat/jetty when deployed in them is
better too
Le 5 mai 2013 07:48, "Claus Ibsen" <claus.ib...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi
>
> Yeah using the websocket jsr would be a good idea. I would assume
> Atmosphere implements the JSR or will do.
> Though if there is another library than Atmosphere that implements the
> jsr then we can take a look at that too. Its not written in stone that
> we must use Atmosphere. Just  that ideally the websocket shouldn't be
> tied to Jetty as it is today.
>
> So if we can provide an alternative that would be nice.
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Would be great to use the new websocket jsr by default, no?
> > Le 4 mai 2013 10:29, "Claus Ibsen" <claus.ib...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> No the current camel-websocket is Jetty based.
> >> There is a ticket to create a new component using the Atmosphere
> >> framework which is container agnostic.
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Chris Wolf <cwolf.a...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > I see that it uses Jetty to launch a web server for camel-websocket in
> >> > producer mode.  I'm seeing some
> >> > dependency clashes with JBoss - before I sort that out - let me ask,
> >> > will it even work?
> >> >
> >> > It seems a bit unconventional to launch an embedded servlet container
> >> > from within a web application.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Chris
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Claus Ibsen
> >> -----------------
> >> Red Hat, Inc.
> >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> >> Email: cib...@redhat.com
> >> Web: http://fusesource.com
> >> Twitter: davsclaus
> >> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> >> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> Email: cib...@redhat.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>

Reply via email to