Hi Ah yeah failover load balancer uses getProcessors() to get the list to use. I guess we should maybe allow this to be a bit more dynamic in the sense so you can extend the failover load balancer, and choose the processor to use each time. So you can use the sticky correlation to pick the same. And in case of a failover then use another.
This requires a bit code change in camel-core to support this. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:36 AM, DavideC <davidecoc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Claus, > > thnaks for the suggestion. I'm trying to follow your advice and I came out > with the following: > > > > But it seems that it is ignoring the "mySticky.process(exchange, callback);" > and performing only "super.process(exchange, callback);". Does this approach > make sense or am I completely on a wrong way? > > Thanks again, > Davide > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Sticky-load-balancer-and-failover-support-tp5734295p5734620.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference. Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
