Hi Logged a ticket to not forget about this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6484
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Ah yeah failover load balancer uses getProcessors() to get the list to > use. I guess we should maybe allow this to be a bit more dynamic in > the sense so you can extend the failover load balancer, and choose the > processor to use each time. So you can use the sticky correlation to > pick the same. And in case of a failover then use another. > > This requires a bit code change in camel-core to support this. > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:36 AM, DavideC <davidecoc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Claus, >> >> thnaks for the suggestion. I'm trying to follow your advice and I came out >> with the following: >> >> >> >> But it seems that it is ignoring the "mySticky.process(exchange, callback);" >> and performing only "super.process(exchange, callback);". Does this approach >> make sense or am I completely on a wrong way? >> >> Thanks again, >> Davide >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Sticky-load-balancer-and-failover-support-tp5734295p5734620.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference. > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > Email: cib...@redhat.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: davsclaus > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference. Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
