If you're not aware and you need a workaround and this suits your scenario,
you'll get the body as the InputStream if you don't use Simple.
ie <camel:to uri="bean://streamBodyBindingBean?method=bodyBinding"/>
Taariq
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yeah sounds like a bug. Do you mind logging a JIRA ticket?
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:25 AM, <radek_kr...@centrum.cz> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I am playing with "bean binding" on bean component. I know, that I can
> solve my requirements by another way.
> > But anyway I think, that my "syntetic" example doesn't work how I expect
> (I tested it with Camel 2.11.2, 2.12.1).
> >
> > I have a "streamBodyBindingBean" bean with this method:
> >
> > public void bodyBinding(InputStream in) throws IOException {
> > int byteCount = 0;
> > int c;
> > while((c = in.read()) != -1)
> > byteCount++;
> > System.out.println("ByteCount: " + byteCount);
> > }
> >
> > And this route:
> >
> > <route id="" trace="true">
> > <from uri="direct://body-input-stream-binding-in"/>
> > <to uri="bean://streamBodyBindingBean?method=bodyBinding(${body})"/>
> > <!-- to uri="bean://isBodyBindingBean"/-->
> > <to uri="mock://body-input-stream-binding-out"/>
> > </route>
> >
> > Here is a way how I send exchange from test stuff:
> >
> > ByteArrayInputStream in = new ByteArrayInputStream(
> > "Small body, which I want to bind as InputStream".getBytes("UTF-8")
> > );
> > Exchange exchange = createExchangeWithBody(in);
> > exchange.getIn().setHeader("testHeader", "testHeader");
> > exchange.setPattern(ExchangePattern.InOnly);
> > template.send("direct://body-input-stream-binding-in", exchange);
> >
> > In this case I got a sysout message: "ByteCount: 0".
> > When I used the commented variant in route, I got expected result:
> "ByteCount: 47", => is it an ${body} evaluation problem?
> >
> > I think that the reason is MethodInfo class, line 526 (with strange
> comment for me):
> >
> > // the parameter value was not already valid, but since the simple
> language have evaluated the expression
> > // which may change the parameterValue, so we have to check it again to
> see if its now valid
> > exp = exchange.getContext().getTypeConverter().convertTo(String.class,
> parameterValue);
> > // String values from the simple language is always valid
> > if (!valid) {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > The line after "strange" comment caused that my "InputStream" is
> transformed into String (what can be a problem in case of "big"
> InputStream).
> > The question is, why this line isn't in "if(!valid)" block? I am unable
> to decide, if it is a problem, which should be reported to JIRA or
> > I only don't understand how bean binding should work or if I have only
> "stupid/incorrect" example.
> >
> > This i a reason, why I ask first here.
> >
> > Thank you for any feedback.
> > Radek Kraus.
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Email: cib...@redhat.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>
