Hi Robert! Thanks for your good work. We appreciate it. It looks really cool and I think this poster provides a good overview which components do we have in each particular area.
As outlined in [1] and mentioned by James, you should - refer to "The Apache Camel Components Poster" instead of "The Camel Components Poster" Thanks for your cooperation and willing to update the poster. I don't think it's an issue to have the "GLIESIAN, LLC." whatermark and footer, but prefer to have the trademarks ok. Therefore, I also put trademarks@ in CC to request their permission that you can publish/sell this poster [2] after the mentioned update. [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#guidelines [2] http://gliesian.com/camel/TheCamelComponentPosterWithWatermark.pdf Best, Christian Müller V.P. Apache Camel On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:22 AM, gliesian <glies...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi James, > > I looked at the cover of the "Camel in Action" book and "Apache" is not > mentioned anywhere: > > http://www.amazon.com/Camel-Action-Claus-Ibsen/dp/1935182366/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1380838736&sr=8-1&keywords=camel+in+action > > So, I figured that the approach I took with the title of the poster was > okay, "The Camel Components Poster". > > I do mention Apache in a few places on the poster... > (1) Bottom left: Camel Components (Apache and External) > (2) Bottom right: http://camel.apache.org/components.html > (3) In some of the descriptions: e.g. Apache ServiceMix. > > I can update the poster anyway that is appropriate, please just let me know > exactly what to do, and I will do it. > > Sincerely, > Robert Liguori > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/The-Camel-Components-Poster-PDF-FREE-tp5740752p5740847.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
