Thanks James. Well, yes... sort of. If a producer sends to one broker, I can consume from either as expected...IF both brokers are ok. My concern (that I have from my relayed past experience) is that if I use the failover uri and there is a problem, that my consumer will miss some of the message produced. Maybe this isn't a legitimate concern (although, in my skepticism's defense, the admin who configured it expressed a lack in confidence about it's configuration). Thus, I think the safest way forward may be to point a consumer to each of the brokers. Considering more brokers may come online, what I guess there would be ideally it to funnel all of the brokers into a single endpoint from which I could process. Does that make sense or am I way overcomplicating it? Thanks again.
James Carman wrote > The NoB should be routing your messages for you, shouldn't it? -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Best-way-to-consuming-same-queue-from-two-brokers-tp5742100p5742105.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
