On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Andrew Thorburn <nzi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Apologies for the spam, but this should be the last post, and I > believe there's a bug somewhere. According the documentation > (http://camel.apache.org/simple.html), I should be able to do > something like this: > > ${in.header.type} is 'java.lang.String' > > And I will get back true or false. However, the following > > <camel:setHeader headerName="test"> > <camel:simple > resultType="java.lang.Object">${in.headers[soap.header.globalRequestHeader]} > is 'com.test.GlobalRequestHeader'</camel:simple> > </camel:setHeader> >
This is an expression and not a predicate. You would need to set the resultType to boolean so Camel would know its a predicate. And not sure if Camel 2.10.x is too old to support that way. Newer releases sure does. > Sets the header to the following value: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> > <ns2:globalRequestHeader region="UAT" version="1" xmlns:ns2="uri:com:test"> > <uniqueId>?</uniqueId> > <targetSystem>?</targetSystem> > </ns2:globalRequestHeader> > is 'com.proaxiom.hsbc.xsd.request.GlobalRequestHeader' > > OK, possibly that's due to setting it to java.lang.Object. > > I tried again, but with resultType="java.lang.Boolean" and got back > "false", which is pretty clearly not correct. Tried a few variations > on that, and the value on the left is always converted to a String > before any further processing is conducted, making the "is" operator a > bit pointless (in one case, using ${bean:camelContext}, I got a nasty > exception, which I can share if needed). I assume this is a bug? Has > it been fixed in a later version of Camel? > > - Andrew > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Andrew Thorburn <nzi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I should add here that I want to log the result, so I have something like: >> >> <camel:log message="Message received with action >> [${in.header.SOAPAction}], operation [${in.header.operationName}], >> with GRH [${in.headers[soap.header.globalRequestHeader].getRegion()}]" >> loggingLevel="INFO" /> >> >> But even with the following: >> >> <camel:setHeader headerName="test"> >> <camel:simple >> resultType="java.lang.Object">${headerAs(soap.header.globalRequestHeader, >> com.test.GlobalRequestHeader).getRegion()}</camel:simple> >> </camel:setHeader> >> >> I still get the raw XML instead of the value of the region property. >> It basically seems that what I want isn't possible, and that even >> thinking about using SOAP headers here was a terrible idea, given the >> amount of pain it's caused me. >> >> Thanks, >> >> - Andrew >> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Andrew Thorburn <nzi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I've been having a bunch of trouble trying to do something that seems >>> like it should be really simple... Using Camel 2.10.7 on ServiceMix >>> 4.5.2. >>> >>> Basically, I'm sending a SOAP message, which contains a SOAP header >>> that looks like this: >>> >>> <uri:globalRequestHeader region="?" version="?"> >>> <requestDateTime>?</requestDateTime> >>> <uniqueId>?</uniqueId> >>> <targetSystem>?</targetSystem> >>> </uri:globalRequestHeader> >>> >>> Camel takes the bean from a CXF Endpoint in Payload format, and then >>> adds the SOAP headers to the Exchange Headers. In this case, the SOAP >>> header is being marshalled via JAXB before being added to the Exchange >>> Headers (so it's put into the headers as an object). >>> >>> I now have a com.test.GlobalRequestHeader object in my exchange >>> headers, and want to access the property region, say. >>> >>> How do I do this? >>> >>> I've tried ${headerAs(soap.header.globalRequestHeader, >>> com.test.GlobalRequestHeader).region} and that doesn't work. I've >>> tried a bunch of other ways of doing in via Simple, and it just does >>> not work. Checking TRACE logs, I see that it's always being converted >>> to a String, instead of having methods called on it, which is a bit >>> strange. Is it possible that the fact that it's a JAXB-annotated class >>> is interfering with the Simple language somehow? >>> >>> I can definitely access the header, because I see the XML being >>> written out to the log, but I don't want the goddamn XML, I want the >>> value of the property. But no matter how I try, all I see in the log >>> is the header objected converted to XML, not the value of the >>> property. >>> >>> I have tried the following expressions: >>> >>> [${headerAs(soap.header.globalRequestHeader, >>> com.test.GlobalRequestHeader).getRegion()}] >>> [${headerAs(soap.header.globalRequestHeader, >>> com.test.GlobalRequestHeader).region}] >>> [${in.headers[soap.header.globalRequestHeader].region}] >>> [${in.headers[soap.header.globalRequestHeader].getRegion()}] >>> >>> The first two put out XML in the log. The second two put out null / >>> the empty string. >>> >>> I really hope I'm missing something, because it doesn't seem like it >>> should be this hard to access a single property on a header object. >>> The alternative, I guess, would be to pipe the object through another >>> processor and set all the properties as individual headers, which >>> seems a bit absurd, frankly. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> - Andrew -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. Email: cib...@redhat.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen