If we cannot access the attachment from the the MessageContentList in POJO model, the solution sounds good.
-- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. Web: http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On November 26, 2014 at 5:11:18 AM, Paul McCulloch (pkmccull...@gmail.com) wrote: > Is it worth my while to submit a patch to support inbound anonymous > attachments, I guess with some configuration option to enable the feature? > > Paul > > On 21 November 2014 at 17:26, Paul McCulloch wrote: > > > I should probably add that I am trying to handle 'anonymous' attachments - > > they are not referenced in the WSDL at all. > > > > On 21 November 2014 09:36, Paul McCulloch wrote: > > > >> This test cases are for MTOM though I think. I need to use SOAP with > >> Attachments for my service. > >> > >> Thanks again, > >> > >> Paul > >> > >> On 21 November 2014 05:41, Willem Jiang wrote: > >> > >>> The attachment is mapped by CXF into the MessageContentList. > >>> Here is an unit test[1] in camel-cxf for it, you can find the wsdl file > >>> here[2] > >>> > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/components/camel-cxf/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/component/cxf/mtom/CxfMtomConsumerTest.java > >>> > >>> [2] > >>> https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/components/camel-cxf/src/test/resources/mtom.wsdl > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Willem Jiang > >>> > >>> Red Hat, Inc. > >>> Web: http://www.redhat.com > >>> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) > >>> http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) > >>> Twitter: willemjiang > >>> Weibo: 姜宁willem > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On November 21, 2014 at 2:48:50 AM, Paul McCulloch ( > >>> pkmccull...@gmail.com) wrote: > >>> > Thanks for getting back to me Willem. I'm afraid I don't understand > >>> your > >>> > reply though! What do you mean by "the POJO parameter list"? > >>> > > >>> > I thought you might mean that the attachments get added as additional > >>> > entries to the MessageContentList - but that doesn't seem to be the > >>> case. I > >>> > had a look through the source and can't find anywhere that the > >>> incoming CXF > >>> > attachment is propagated to the POJO, message or exchange. > >>> > > >>> > My use case is implementing a WSD first SOAP service supporting Soap > >>> > with attachments on incoming messages. > >>> > > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > > >>> > Paul > >>> > > >>> > On 20 November 2014 04:25, Willem Jiang wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Hi Paul, > >>> > > > >>> > > For the POJO, we don’t want to export the attachment from message to > >>> the > >>> > > user as the user can access the attachment from the POJO parameter > >>> list. > >>> > > If we expose the attachment throw the message API for the POJO data > >>> > > formate, it could cause some trouble if the user makes some changes > >>> through > >>> > > the message and POJO parameter list at same time. > >>> > > > >>> > > -- > >>> > > Willem Jiang > >>> > > > >>> > > Red Hat, Inc. > >>> > > Web: http://www.redhat.com > >>> > > Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) > >>> > > http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) > >>> > > Twitter: willemjiang > >>> > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > On November 20, 2014 at 12:53:17 AM, pkmcculloch ( > >>> pkmccull...@gmail.com) > >>> > > wrote: > >>> > > > I agree that the work for CAMEL-7181 doesn't cover all cases. > >>> Looking at > >>> > > the > >>> > > > current source I see a couple of issues: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > 1) populateExchangeFromCxfRequest(Exchange, Exchange) doesn't check > >>> > > > MTOM_ENABLED - it never includes attachments for POJOs > >>> > > > > >>> > > > 2) populateCxfResponseFromExchange(Exchange, Exchange) - the same > >>> issue. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Can someone re-open the JIRA task? Or should I log a new one? > >>> > > > > >>> > > > I'm quite happy to make the fixes. What's the best format to > >>> submit the > >>> > > fix > >>> > > > - patch or pull request? > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Thanks, > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Paul > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > -- > >>> > > > View this message in context: > >>> > > > >>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/CXF-component-attachment-support-for-POJO-not-implemented-as-specified-tp5746952p5759332.html > >>> > >>> > > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >> > > >
