Hi Yeah I am not sure if end users would be surprised if we change == to be case insensitive for strings?
Or we could consider having =~ as an alternative comparison operator (although =~ may not be though as insensitive operator?) If we have a new operator or change the default behavior it would have the performance benefit to avoid the reflection method invocation that a .toLowerCase() would require. Any thoughts in the community ? On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:52 PM, s.marjanovic <slavisa.marjanovic...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > I managed to find the same information as you posted in the example, > although without the "?" part. > > Great tip about that, thanks. > > Regards, > Slavisa > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Can-simple-be-made-to-compare-strings-in-a-case-insensitive-way-tp5767732p5767756.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. Email: cib...@redhat.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen hawtio: http://hawt.io/ fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
