Hi I logged a ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8832
We can still consider other alternatives for the operation symbols. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would rather see a new operator than changing the behaviour of == > > > On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 at 09:44 Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Yeah I am not sure if end users would be surprised if we change == to >> be case insensitive for strings? >> >> Or we could consider having =~ as an alternative comparison operator >> (although =~ may not be though as insensitive operator?) >> >> If we have a new operator or change the default behavior it would have >> the performance benefit to avoid the reflection method invocation that >> a .toLowerCase() would require. >> >> >> Any thoughts in the community ? >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:52 PM, s.marjanovic >> <slavisa.marjanovic...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hello Andrew, >> > >> > I managed to find the same information as you posted in the example, >> > although without the "?" part. >> > >> > Great tip about that, thanks. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Slavisa >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > View this message in context: >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Can-simple-be-made-to-compare-strings-in-a-case-insensitive-way-tp5767732p5767756.html >> > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> -- >> Claus Ibsen >> ----------------- >> Red Hat, Inc. >> Email: cib...@redhat.com >> Twitter: davsclaus >> Blog: http://davsclaus.com >> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen >> hawtio: http://hawt.io/ >> fabric8 <http://hawt.io/fabric8>: http://fabric8.io/ >> -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. Email: cib...@redhat.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen hawtio: http://hawt.io/ fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
