Are they even aware of the problem with sourceforge?
Maybe someone that is known there (such as a member of an Apache Project
;) could tell them before they take the wrong decision?
It's even worse than what I thought because after the Gimp people told
SF to stop doing their shady things, they actually insisted during 2015:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00097.html
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00098.html
Victor
Le 04/09/2015 15:36, Raul Kripalani a écrit :
Quite frankly, SF would be my last resort. But the Apache Extras
repositories are governed by the ASF and the consensus seems to point to SF
rather than Github (which would have been my personal preference) or
Bitbucket.
Regards,
*Raúl Kripalani*
Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
Integration specialist
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Victor NOËL <victor.n...@linagora.com>
wrote:
I arrive a bit late, but are we sure sourceforge is a good solution?
After all the fuss about their terrible behaviour by implanting adware and
other spyware in installers available to download there.
It became known with the big complain of the Gimp project (that wasn't
even fixed by SourceForge…).
See
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_ads_and_installer/
for details.
Victor
Le 04/09/2015 13:29, Pontus Ullgren a écrit :
Do we not already have volunteers in the current set of contributors for
the project ?
I for one is willing in continue maintaining the project once it has been
moved (where ever it is moved).
I think the question right now is the progress of the SF migration.
// Pontus
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 09:18 Henryk Konsek <hekon...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
As far as I know the Apache Extras projects are being moved to the...
SourceForge. So we need to find a volunteer willing to maintain the
project
after SourceForge migration.
Cheers!
czw., 3.09.2015 o 20:38 użytkownik Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com>
napisał:
Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no.
Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in charge
of
the move) to get a status update for camel-extra.
// Pontus
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> wrote:
Hey guys,
Do we have an update on the ASF front about the Apache Extras
migration?
Users are asking for new releases of camel-extras components...
I quickly went through the ComDev thread but found no conclusion.
Maybe I
overlooked an email in that thread. Things tend to get very chatty over
there and there's no clearly marked conclusion email.
Regards,
*Raúl Kripalani*
Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
Integration specialist
http://about.me/raulkripalani |
http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com>
wrote:
From this thread[1] it seems that Daniel Gruno is the one in charge
for
the move.
However I fail to find any indication on the progress or roadmap.
Using Github as a backup plan does NOT[2] seem to be a option in the
opinion of the community-dev decision.
Anyway perhaps we should move this discussion to the camel-dev
mailinglist.
[1]
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3C559EC097.7000707%40apache.org%3E
[2]
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3cby2pr03mb490b6943e12f5d925203a2e99...@by2pr03mb490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E
// Pontus
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 07:17 Christoph Emmersberger <
cemme...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Is there any date when this move is expected? We have still the
backup
plan
with Github in place, ...
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Diging through the community development list shows that it will
be
moved
to sourceforge along with the rest of the apache extra.
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/browser
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:12 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Yes this has been discussed on the dev list[1][2] and the
Apache
community
development mailing list [2].
Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this
discussion
yet.
// Pontus
[1]
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html
[2]
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-camel-extra-moves-forward-tt5765822.html
[3]
http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-community
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 18:53 Tim Dudgeon <
tdudgeon...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Now that the Google code site is about to switch to read only
(https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/)
I
wondered
what is going to happen to the Camel Extras stuff?
Tim
--
Henryk Konsek
http://about.me/hekonsek
--
Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et supportée
par Linagora.
Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise.
http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com
--
Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et
supportée par Linagora.
Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise.
http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com
