The way I read it is comdev are doing a mass migration to SF - its understandable they wouldn’t want multiple targets - so to pick one destination for the code move makes sense. However its not clear that we have to keep camel-extra at SF - or why we couldn’t just move it to GitHub ourselves ?
> On 4 Sep 2015, at 15:54, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Victor and David: You are welcome to join the com-dev mailing list and > enlighten them. > Here is a link the latest answer on that question :-) > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201507.mbox/%3CBY2PR03MB490B6943E12F5D925203A2E99900%40BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E > > // Pontus > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 16:01 David Karlsen <davidkarl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why not github? >> 4. sep. 2015 3:54 p.m. skrev "Victor NOËL" <victor.n...@linagora.com>: >> >>> Are they even aware of the problem with sourceforge? >>> Maybe someone that is known there (such as a member of an Apache Project >>> ;) could tell them before they take the wrong decision? >>> >>> It's even worse than what I thought because after the Gimp people told SF >>> to stop doing their shady things, they actually insisted during 2015: >>> >> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00097.html >>> >> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00098.html >>> >>> Victor >>> >>> Le 04/09/2015 15:36, Raul Kripalani a écrit : >>> >>>> Quite frankly, SF would be my last resort. But the Apache Extras >>>> repositories are governed by the ASF and the consensus seems to point to >>>> SF >>>> rather than Github (which would have been my personal preference) or >>>> Bitbucket. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> *Raúl Kripalani* >>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source >>>> Integration specialist >>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani >>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Victor NOËL <victor.n...@linagora.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I arrive a bit late, but are we sure sourceforge is a good solution? >>>>> >>>>> After all the fuss about their terrible behaviour by implanting adware >>>>> and >>>>> other spyware in installers available to download there. >>>>> It became known with the big complain of the Gimp project (that wasn't >>>>> even fixed by SourceForge…). >>>>> >>>>> See >>>>> >>>>> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_ads_and_installer/ >>>>> for details. >>>>> >>>>> Victor >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 04/09/2015 13:29, Pontus Ullgren a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Do we not already have volunteers in the current set of contributors >> for >>>>>> the project ? >>>>>> I for one is willing in continue maintaining the project once it has >>>>>> been >>>>>> moved (where ever it is moved). >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the question right now is the progress of the SF migration. >>>>>> >>>>>> // Pontus >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 09:18 Henryk Konsek <hekon...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>>> As far as I know the Apache Extras projects are being moved to the... >>>>>>> SourceForge. So we need to find a volunteer willing to maintain the >>>>>>> project >>>>>>> after SourceForge migration. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> czw., 3.09.2015 o 20:38 użytkownik Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com >>> >>>>>>> napisał: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in >>>>>>>> charge >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the move) to get a status update for camel-extra. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> // Pontus >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> >> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do we have an update on the ASF front about the Apache Extras >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> migration? >>>>>>>> Users are asking for new releases of camel-extras components... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I quickly went through the ComDev thread but found no conclusion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe I >>>>>>>> overlooked an email in that thread. Things tend to get very chatty >>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> there and there's no clearly marked conclusion email. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani* >>>>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open >>>>>>>>> Source >>>>>>>>> Integration specialist >>>>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani >>>>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com >>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From this thread[1] it seems that Daniel Gruno is the one in >> charge >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> the move. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> However I fail to find any indication on the progress or roadmap. >>>>>>>>>> Using Github as a backup plan does NOT[2] seem to be a option in >> the >>>>>>>>>> opinion of the community-dev decision. >>>>>>>>>> Anyway perhaps we should move this discussion to the camel-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> mailinglist. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3C559EC097.7000707%40apache.org%3E >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3cby2pr03mb490b6943e12f5d925203a2e99...@by2pr03mb490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E >>>>>>> >>>>>>> // Pontus >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 07:17 Christoph Emmersberger < >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cemme...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is there any date when this move is expected? We have still the >>>>>>>>>> backup >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> plan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> with Github in place, ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Pontus Ullgren < >> ullg...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Diging through the community development list shows that it will >>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> moved >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> to sourceforge along with the rest of the apache extra. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/browser >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:12 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes this has been discussed on the dev list[1][2] and the >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> community >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> development mailing list [2]. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>>>>> yet. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-camel-extra-moves-forward-tt5765822.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [3] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-community >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 18:53 Tim Dudgeon < >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tdudgeon...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now that the Google code site is about to switch to read only >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wondered >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> what is going to happen to the Camel Extras stuff? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Henryk Konsek >>>>>>> http://about.me/hekonsek >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et >> supportée >>>>> par Linagora. >>>>> Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise. >>>>> http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et supportée >>> par Linagora. >>> Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise. >>> http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com >>> >>
