Hi,
1. Each message from each Jms should be processed in a separated
transaction and will be passed to a webservice. Additionaly basen on a
certain message part a file will be transfered from one ftp to another.
2. For each message independend from which broker it comes a new
transaction should be created.
Best,
Stan
12 lut 2016 5:17 PM "Quinn Stevenson" <qu...@pronoia-solutions.com>
napisał(a):
> Two questions -
>
> - What are the other transaction endpoints you’ll be using?
> - Will messages from both broker1 and broker2 be involved in the same
> transaction?
>
>
> > On Feb 12, 2016, at 1:19 AM, Stanisław Kuś <stasi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks for answering. I have two separate servers running ActiveMQ ( my
> > datasources ) and a single Camel App that should consume from those 2
> > instances in a transactional way.
> >
> > What I can do is from( broker1:queue:source,
> > broker2:queue:source).process(.... . The problem is what transaction
> > manager should I use ? Trying with JTATransactionManager for all of them
> > or use separated JMSTransactionManager for each server ?
> >
> > Thanks for anwers,
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Stan
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Quinn Stevenson <
> > qu...@pronoia-solutions.com> wrote:
> >
> >> You can always have two “from” clauses and route the exchange to a
> direct
> >> route for the common processing.
> >>
> >> from( “activemq1://queue1”).to( “direct://process );
> >> from( “activemq2://queue2”).to( “direct://process );
> >>
> >> from( “direct://process” )…….
> >>
> >> Can you give a little more detail on what you’re trying to accomplish
> with
> >> the transaction?
> >>
> >>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 4:17 AM, Stanisław Kuś <stasi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>>
> >>> I have a short question :
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible to consume from 2 different brokers within a single
> Route
> >>> with transactions.
> >>>
> >>> something like form("activemq1:queue1", "activemq2:queue" )....
> >>>
> >>> Do I need to specify a separate transaction manager pro
> >>> ActiveMQConnectionFactory instance or is there a way to have one
> >>> (Transaction M.) for both ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for answers in advance !
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> Stan
> >>
> >>
>
>
