It sounds like you’re not using any other endpoints that support transactions,
so all you should need is the “transacted=true” URI - I don’t think you’ll need
an external transaction manager.
> On Feb 12, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Stanisław Kuś <stasi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 1. Each message from each Jms should be processed in a separated
> transaction and will be passed to a webservice. Additionaly basen on a
> certain message part a file will be transfered from one ftp to another.
>
> 2. For each message independend from which broker it comes a new
> transaction should be created.
>
> Best,
>
> Stan
> 12 lut 2016 5:17 PM "Quinn Stevenson" <qu...@pronoia-solutions.com>
> napisał(a):
>
>> Two questions -
>>
>> - What are the other transaction endpoints you’ll be using?
>> - Will messages from both broker1 and broker2 be involved in the same
>> transaction?
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 12, 2016, at 1:19 AM, Stanisław Kuś <stasi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thanks for answering. I have two separate servers running ActiveMQ ( my
>>> datasources ) and a single Camel App that should consume from those 2
>>> instances in a transactional way.
>>>
>>> What I can do is from( broker1:queue:source,
>>> broker2:queue:source).process(.... . The problem is what transaction
>>> manager should I use ? Trying with JTATransactionManager for all of them
>>> or use separated JMSTransactionManager for each server ?
>>>
>>> Thanks for anwers,
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Stan
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Quinn Stevenson <
>>> qu...@pronoia-solutions.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You can always have two “from” clauses and route the exchange to a
>> direct
>>>> route for the common processing.
>>>>
>>>> from( “activemq1://queue1”).to( “direct://process );
>>>> from( “activemq2://queue2”).to( “direct://process );
>>>>
>>>> from( “direct://process” )…….
>>>>
>>>> Can you give a little more detail on what you’re trying to accomplish
>> with
>>>> the transaction?
>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 4:17 AM, Stanisław Kuś <stasi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a short question :
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible to consume from 2 different brokers within a single
>> Route
>>>>> with transactions.
>>>>>
>>>>> something like form("activemq1:queue1", "activemq2:queue" )....
>>>>>
>>>>> Do I need to specify a separate transaction manager pro
>>>>> ActiveMQConnectionFactory instance or is there a way to have one
>>>>> (Transaction M.) for both ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for answers in advance !
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Stan
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
