The jdbc component doesn't require Spring as a dependency. That's the main advantage it has that I know of.
On 30 August 2016 at 08:15, Rajith Muditha Attapattu <rajit...@gmail.com> wrote: > The difference between the two is that with jdbc the query is in the > message body vs the as an endpoint property in sql. > > But it seems from Camel 2.16 onwards, the sql component can do the same. > From the looks of it, both could do what I want. > > I'm just trying to figure out the best component to use. > > What other differences are there btw the components? > I know sql component uses spring jdbc templates. Wondering if sql > component has an advantage over jdbc here. > > Your feedback is greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > > Rajith Muditha Attapattu > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
