Thanks Matt, in some environments thats a significant advantage. On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > The jdbc component doesn't require Spring as a dependency. That's the main > advantage it has that I know of. > > On 30 August 2016 at 08:15, Rajith Muditha Attapattu <rajit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The difference between the two is that with jdbc the query is in the >> message body vs the as an endpoint property in sql. >> >> But it seems from Camel 2.16 onwards, the sql component can do the same. >> From the looks of it, both could do what I want. >> >> I'm just trying to figure out the best component to use. >> >> What other differences are there btw the components? >> I know sql component uses spring jdbc templates. Wondering if sql >> component has an advantage over jdbc here. >> >> Your feedback is greatly appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rajith Muditha Attapattu >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
-- Regards, Rajith Muditha Attapattu
