Hello, first of all: This is my very first mail in this mailing list, and I am still learning the potential of Camel, so please give me any advise if I can make better 🙂
Summary: I want to manage routes at runtime, and for this it is essential that I can identify a rule by its ID so that I am able to modify or remove it. I choosed YAML as my preferred DSL, but it seems that the ID attribute is not regarded and the route still gets its generic name instead. This seems like a bug for me, as with XML, the ID is used as expected. So before I fill in a bug report I ask (as requested) here if I am doing anything wrong or if you think that this is really a bug. Test case: A very simple Spring-Boot/Camel project: pom.xml: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" Â Â Â Â Â xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" Â Â Â Â Â xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd"> Â Â <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> Â Â <groupId>my.camel.testing</groupId> Â Â <artifactId>camle-testing</artifactId> Â Â <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> Â Â <properties> Â Â Â Â <maven.compiler.source>17</maven.compiler.source> Â Â Â Â <maven.compiler.target>17</maven.compiler.target> Â Â Â Â <project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding> Â Â Â Â <camel.version>4.0.1</camel.version> Â Â </properties> Â Â <dependencies> Â Â Â Â <dependency> Â Â Â Â Â Â <groupId>org.apache.camel.springboot</groupId> Â Â Â Â Â Â <artifactId>camel-spring-boot</artifactId> Â Â Â Â Â Â <version>${camel.version}</version> Â Â Â Â </dependency> Â Â Â Â <dependency> Â Â Â Â Â Â <groupId>org.apache.camel.springboot</groupId> Â Â Â Â Â Â <artifactId>camel-spring-boot-starter</artifactId> Â Â Â Â Â Â <version>${camel.version}</version> Â Â Â Â </dependency> Â Â Â Â <dependency> Â Â Â Â Â Â <groupId>org.apache.camel</groupId> Â Â Â Â Â Â <artifactId>camel-xml-io</artifactId> Â Â Â Â Â Â <version>${camel.version}</version> Â Â Â Â </dependency> Â Â Â Â <dependency> Â Â Â Â Â Â <groupId>org.apache.camel</groupId> Â Â Â Â Â Â <artifactId>camel-xml-io-dsl</artifactId> Â Â Â Â Â Â <version>${camel.version}</version> Â Â Â Â </dependency> Â Â Â Â <dependency> Â Â Â Â Â Â <groupId>org.apache.camel</groupId> Â Â Â Â Â Â <artifactId>camel-yaml-dsl</artifactId> Â Â Â Â Â Â <version>${camel.version}</version> Â Â Â Â </dependency> Â Â </dependencies> </project> Application.java: @SpringBootApplication public class Application { public static void main(String[] args) { SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args); } } Routes (placed in $PROJECT_HOME/camel/, autodetected by camel-spring-boot-starter): myroute1.xml: <routes xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring"> <route id="myRoute1"> <from uri="timer:tick"/> <setBody> <constant>Hello Camel!</constant> </setBody> <to uri="log:info1"/> </route> </routes> myroute2.yaml: - from: id: myRoute2 uri: timer:tick steps: - setBody: constant: Hello Camel! - to: uri: log:info2 I understand that both routes should be doing the same thing and the only difference is the ID. When I start the application, the log shows this: ... 023-10-19T10:41:34.142+02:00 INFO 17160 --- [ main] o.a.c.impl.engine.AbstractCamelContext : Routes startup (started:2) 2023-10-19T10:41:34.142+02:00 INFO 17160 --- [ main] o.a.c.impl.engine.AbstractCamelContext : Started myRoute1 (timer://tick) 2023-10-19T10:41:34.142+02:00 INFO 17160 --- [ main] o.a.c.impl.engine.AbstractCamelContext : Started route1 (timer://tick) 2023-10-19T10:41:34.142+02:00 INFO 17160 --- [ main] o.a.c.impl.engine.AbstractCamelContext : Apache Camel 4.0.1 (camel-1) started in 15ms (build:0ms init:0ms start:15ms) ... Note that the XML route was loaded using the correct ID (myRoute1), but the YAML is using a generic ID (route1). I would expect that the output is: Routes startup (started:2) Started myRoute1 (timer://tick) Started myRoute2 (timer://tick) Apache Camel 4.0.1 (camel-1) started in ... Tested and verified with Camel v4.0.1 and v4.1.0 So, it seems like a bug in the YAML route builder. What do you think? Thank you & kind regards, Steffen // added to skip company footer: 27948 //