What version cloudstack are you running. First time hearing of this issue, I'd 
imagine its a bug.

Ahmad

On Apr 30, 2013, at 6:32 PM, Carlos Reategui <create...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I decided to stop iptables on the host and now the SSVM works and is able
> to get to DNS and download the default Centos template.  Is this a known
> issue?
> 
> This is what it looked like before I stopped it:
> 
> [root@srvengxen01 ~]# iptables -L
> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> target     prot opt source               destination
> RH-Firewall-1-INPUT  all  --  anywhere             anywhere
> 
> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
> target     prot opt source               destination
> RH-Firewall-1-INPUT  all  --  anywhere             anywhere
> 
> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> target     prot opt source               destination
> 
> Chain RH-Firewall-1-INPUT (2 references)
> target     prot opt source               destination
> ACCEPT     all  --  anywhere             anywhere
> ACCEPT     icmp --  anywhere             anywhere            icmp any
> ACCEPT     esp  --  anywhere             anywhere
> ACCEPT     ah   --  anywhere             anywhere
> ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             224.0.0.251         udp dpt:mdns
> ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere            udp dpt:ipp
> ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            tcp dpt:ipp
> ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere            udp dpt:bootps
> ACCEPT     all  --  anywhere             anywhere            state
> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere            state NEW udp
> dpt:ha-cluster
> ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            state NEW tcp
> dpt:ssh
> ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            state NEW tcp
> dpt:http
> ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            state NEW tcp
> dpt:https
> REJECT     all  --  anywhere             anywhere            reject-with
> icmp-host-prohibited
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Carlos Reategui <create...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> Looks like my previous email only went to Ahmad...
>> 
>> To add to my below response.  I also installed bind9 on my management
>> server and set it up as a caching dns to rule out issues with our corporate
>> MS dns servers and still does not work.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Carlos Reategui <car...@reategui.com>wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> looks like you cant route out to the internet. can you ping 8.8.8.8
>>>> directly from the ssvm?
>>> 
>>> Network connectivity appears fine.  As you can see from the test script
>>> it is able to ping the internal DNS server.  I am also able to ping
>>> Google's DNS:
>>> 
>>> root@s-1-VM:~# ping 8.8.8.8
>>> PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
>>> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=45 time=30.694 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=23.546 ms
>>> 
>>> However I just recalled our corporate network does not allow external dns
>>> so I need to stick to the internal one that the SSVM is already configured
>>> for.
>>> 
>>> The odd thing is if I try to telnet to port 53 it says no route to host
>>> (Is there a similar way to test a udp connection?):
>>> root@s-1-VM:~# telnet 172.30.20.176 53
>>> Trying 172.30.20.176...
>>> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
>>> 
>>> But yet a ping works.
>>> 
>>> root@s-1-VM:~# ping 172.30.20.176
>>> PING 172.30.20.176 (172.30.20.176): 56 data bytes
>>> 64 bytes from 172.30.20.176: icmp_seq=0 ttl=127 time=0.690 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 172.30.20.176: icmp_seq=1 ttl=127 time=0.674 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 172.30.20.176: icmp_seq=2 ttl=127 time=0.674 ms
>>> 
>>> Traceroute looks ok:
>>> root@s-1-VM:~# traceroute -n 172.30.20.176
>>> traceroute to 172.30.20.176 (172.30.20.176), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
>>> 1  172.30.45.32  0.273 ms !X  0.235 ms !X  0.211 ms !X
>>> 
>>> any other ideas?
>> 

Reply via email to