Hi,

Did you configure the egress firewall rules on the guest network ?
You need to add egress rules to allow guest traffic.

After adding egress rule it not works, please send router iptables rules.

Thanks,
Jayapal

On 22-May-2013, at 4:10 AM, wq meng <wqm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello
> 
> Anyone have faced this problem?  CS4.02 KVM Advanced Network, VM instance
> can not access public IP.  NAT(Source)
> 
> 
> That the VM instance running, but inside the VM instance, it is not
> possible to access outside.
> 
> 
> It can ping VMs each other,   It can ping google.com in the* Virtual Router
> VM.*
> 
> But just can not ping Google.com inside the VM instance.
> 
> 
> Seems inside the VM instance,  It can resolve the Google.com 's IP address.
> BUT can not do others.
> 
> Please see the following output.
> 
> 
> ------------------------
> [root@CentOS5-5 ~]# wget www.google.com
> --2013-05-21 08:30:39--  http://www.google.com/
> Resolving www.google.com... 173.194.64.104, 173.194.64.99, 173.194.64.105,
> ...
> Connecting to www.google.com|173.194.64.104|:80...
> [root@CentOS5-5 ~]# ls
> 
> -------------------------
> [root@CentOS5-5 ~]# iptables -L
> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> target     prot opt source               destination
> RH-Firewall-1-INPUT  all  --  anywhere             anywhere
> 
> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
> target     prot opt source               destination
> RH-Firewall-1-INPUT  all  --  anywhere             anywhere
> 
> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> target     prot opt source               destination
> 
> Chain RH-Firewall-1-INPUT (2 references)
> target     prot opt source               destination
> ACCEPT     all  --  anywhere             anywhere
> ACCEPT     icmp --  anywhere             anywhere            icmp any
> ACCEPT     esp  --  anywhere             anywhere
> ACCEPT     ah   --  anywhere             anywhere
> ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             224.0.0.251         udp dpt:mdns
> ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere            udp dpt:ipp
> ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            tcp dpt:ipp
> ACCEPT     all  --  anywhere             anywhere            state
> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            state NEW tcp
> dpt:ssh
> REJECT     all  --  anywhere             anywhere            reject-with
> icmp-host-prohibited
> [root@CentOS5-5 ~]# ping 8.8.8.8
> PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 
> --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
> 3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2000ms
> 
> --------------------------
> [root@CentOS5-5 ~]# ifconfig
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 02:00:2D:C8:00:01
>          inet addr:10.1.1.5  Bcast:10.1.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>          inet6 addr: fe80::2dff:fec8:1/64 Scope:Link
>          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>          RX packets:2442 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>          TX packets:2261 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>          RX bytes:174960 (170.8 KiB)  TX bytes:154159 (150.5 KiB)
> 
> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>          RX packets:32 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>          TX packets:32 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>          RX bytes:3913 (3.8 KiB)  TX bytes:3913 (3.8 KiB)
> 
> ----------------------------
> 
> [root@CentOS5-5 ~]# tracert www.google.com
> traceroute to www.google.com (173.194.64.106), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1  r-4-VM.cs2cloud.internal (10.1.1.1)  0.158 ms  0.136 ms  0.134 ms
> 2  * * *
> 3  * * *
> 4  * * *
> 5  * * *
> 6  * * *
> 7  * * *
> 8  * * *
> 9  * * *
> 10  * * *
> 11  * * *
> 12  * * *
> 13  * * *
> 14  * * *
> 15  * * *
> 16  * * *
> 17  * * *
> 18  * * *
> 19  * * *
> 20  * * *
> 21  * * *
> 22  * * *
> 23  * * *
> 24  * * *
> 25  * * *
> 26  * * *
> 27  * * *
> 28  * * *
> 29  * * *
> 30  * * *
> 
> ----------------
> 
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you very much.

Reply via email to