Indra,
How big are the templates you are attempting to deploy? I could see the 1
Gbps connection being a little bit of a bottleneck, but it sounds like there
may be something else going on. I know we would have issues on our setup which
is on 1 Gbps connections at the moment if we tried to do multiple snapshots at
once, but we could normally get away with deploying a couple VMs at once within
a few minutes. As for the question about how they are being copied, I am not
100% confident on this, but I believe it is copied via the SSVM, so it would be
going secondary storage --> hypervisor host --> primary storage. Hopefully
someone will correct me if I am wrong on that.
-David
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:33:17 +0800
> Subject: Re: CloudStack performance issue
> From: in...@sg.or.id
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> Hi David,
>
> Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
>
> My secondary storage is connected to the switch using 1 Gbps connection,
> while my primary storage is connected via a 10 Gbps connection.
> Unfortunately I don't have 10G NIC cards on my secondary storage. Do you
> think upgrading my secondary storage's NIC to 10 Gbps will help?
>
> May I know how the template and ISOs are being copied, is it through the
> hypervisor host (e.g. secondary storage --> hypervisor host --> primary
> storage) or directly (i.e. secondary storage --> primary storage)? My
> primary storage is not on the same subnet/VLAN as secondary storage, since
> it's connected to different NIC cards on the hypervisor hosts. If it's a
> direct connection between secondary storage to primary storage without
> going to the hypervisor, I might be considering changing my network
> topology to make the primary and secondary storage to be on the same
> subnet/VLAN.
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:19 AM, David Ortiz <dpor...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> > Meant that question for Indra. Sorry.
> >
> > > From: dpor...@outlook.com
> > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: CloudStack performance issue
> > > Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:34:10 -0400
> > >
> > > Prasanna,
> > > What kind of network do you use for your setup? Creating a new VM
> > requires copying the template or ISO over from secondary storage to
> > primary, so that could be a bottleneck when trying to create multiple VMs
> > at once.
> > > -Dave
> > >
> > > > Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:20:08 +0530
> > > > From: t...@apache.org
> > > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: CloudStack performance issue
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 03:18:12PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Where can I start troubleshooting, which logs I need to go through
> > to find
> > > > > out the bottleneck? The management-server.log file doesn't show much
> > > > > anything about the delay. It seems that there is some "locking"
> > mechanism
> > > > > and certain processes will need other processes to complete before
> > they can
> > > > > start. This is worrying since in a production environment, many
> > customers
> > > > > might want to try creating VMs at the same time simultaneously.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The logs of use would be managment-server.log which defaults to DEBUG
> > > > mode. The logs on the agent (inside KVM host) are default in INFO
> > > > mode. You can turn them up to DEBUG by altering the log4j config.
> > > > Apart from that you can also look at libvirt logs. Folks have been
> > > > tuning the deployment of the VMs on KVM host in another thread on dev@
> > > > and in the bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3163
> > > >
> > > > let us know if the symptoms are the same and you can bring this up on
> > > > dev@ with more details.
> > > >
> > > > > Any thoughts or feedback on this matter is appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Prasanna.,
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------
> > > > Powered by BigRock.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
