Hi David, Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
Most of my templates are on 100 GB root disk, which I understand is too big. I plan to recreate the templates on a 10 GB disk, which should be sufficient based on an advice from another member of this mailing list on another thread. Do you think that might be the cause? I hope that deployment time will be much faster after I recreated the templates. Thank you. On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:22 AM, David Ortiz <dpor...@outlook.com> wrote: > Indra, > How big are the templates you are attempting to deploy? I could see > the 1 Gbps connection being a little bit of a bottleneck, but it sounds > like there may be something else going on. I know we would have issues on > our setup which is on 1 Gbps connections at the moment if we tried to do > multiple snapshots at once, but we could normally get away with deploying a > couple VMs at once within a few minutes. As for the question about how > they are being copied, I am not 100% confident on this, but I believe it is > copied via the SSVM, so it would be going secondary storage --> hypervisor > host --> primary storage. Hopefully someone will correct me if I am wrong > on that. > -David > > > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:33:17 +0800 > > Subject: Re: CloudStack performance issue > > From: in...@sg.or.id > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > > > Hi David, > > > > Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. > > > > My secondary storage is connected to the switch using 1 Gbps connection, > > while my primary storage is connected via a 10 Gbps connection. > > Unfortunately I don't have 10G NIC cards on my secondary storage. Do you > > think upgrading my secondary storage's NIC to 10 Gbps will help? > > > > May I know how the template and ISOs are being copied, is it through the > > hypervisor host (e.g. secondary storage --> hypervisor host --> primary > > storage) or directly (i.e. secondary storage --> primary storage)? My > > primary storage is not on the same subnet/VLAN as secondary storage, > since > > it's connected to different NIC cards on the hypervisor hosts. If it's a > > direct connection between secondary storage to primary storage without > > going to the hypervisor, I might be considering changing my network > > topology to make the primary and secondary storage to be on the same > > subnet/VLAN. > > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > > > > Cheers. > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:19 AM, David Ortiz <dpor...@outlook.com> > wrote: > > > > > Meant that question for Indra. Sorry. > > > > > > > From: dpor...@outlook.com > > > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > > > Subject: RE: CloudStack performance issue > > > > Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:34:10 -0400 > > > > > > > > Prasanna, > > > > What kind of network do you use for your setup? Creating a new > VM > > > requires copying the template or ISO over from secondary storage to > > > primary, so that could be a bottleneck when trying to create multiple > VMs > > > at once. > > > > -Dave > > > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:20:08 +0530 > > > > > From: t...@apache.org > > > > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > > > > Subject: Re: CloudStack performance issue > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 03:18:12PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Where can I start troubleshooting, which logs I need to go > through > > > to find > > > > > > out the bottleneck? The management-server.log file doesn't show > much > > > > > > anything about the delay. It seems that there is some "locking" > > > mechanism > > > > > > and certain processes will need other processes to complete > before > > > they can > > > > > > start. This is worrying since in a production environment, many > > > customers > > > > > > might want to try creating VMs at the same time simultaneously. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The logs of use would be managment-server.log which defaults to > DEBUG > > > > > mode. The logs on the agent (inside KVM host) are default in INFO > > > > > mode. You can turn them up to DEBUG by altering the log4j config. > > > > > Apart from that you can also look at libvirt logs. Folks have been > > > > > tuning the deployment of the VMs on KVM host in another thread on > dev@ > > > > > and in the bug > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3163 > > > > > > > > > > let us know if the symptoms are the same and you can bring this up > on > > > > > dev@ with more details. > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts or feedback on this matter is appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Prasanna., > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ > > > > > Powered by BigRock.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
