Dear Marcus, Kirk and all,

Any further recommendations on how can I troubleshoot on this matter to
pinpoint the cause of the inability to resize the disk, and to find the
solution to the problem?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.



On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Indra Pramana <in...@sg.or.id> wrote:

> Hi Marcus and Kirk,
>
> Good day to you, and thank you for your email replies.
>
> We are using Ceph RBD primary storage. I can't find any error information
> on agent.log, and I have set the logging to verbose (DEBUG) for all.
>
> Since I am using RBD, am I still able to run the qemu-img info command?
>
> I check the volumes table contain load of information. How do I check
> which record is referring to the virtual disk in question?
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Kirk Kosinski <kirkkosin...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Yes, if there was a problem it should have been logged in the agent.log.
>>  If it was successful it may or may not be logged depending on the
>> logging level.  While logged on to the hypervisor, check the actual
>> virtual disk with "qemu-img info /mnt/somepath/filename".  The filename
>> can be found in the CloudStack database (the "path" field for the
>> virtual disk in the volumes table).
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Kirk
>>
>> On 10/03/2013 03:47 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>> > What primary storage are you using? Any errors in agent log?
>> > On Oct 3, 2013 3:16 PM, "Indra Pramana" <in...@sg.or.id> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Marcus,
>> >>
>> >> Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
>> >>
>> >> I have tried restarting the VM and even stop and start the VM, but
>> after
>> >> logging in to the VM, I still see the hard drive's size as 20 GB
>> instead of
>> >> 60 GB.
>> >>
>> >> I tried to check /var/log/libvirt/libvirtd.log file on the KVM host
>> where
>> >> the VM is hosted, and can't find any messages related to
>> volBlockResize.
>> >>
>> >> Any other troubleshooting steps you can recommend, i.e. any other area
>> I
>> >> can look into?
>> >>
>> >> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I just tested local storage qcow2 and CLVM resize on 4.2, they both
>> >> worked.
>> >>>
>> >>> Resize works like this:
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Do sanity checks
>> >>> 2. Send resize command to the agent
>> >>> 3. Resize the disk/lun/file
>> >>> 4. Inform the VM instance that the disk has changed by making a
>> >>> libvirt volBlockResize call (this is not fatal, some guest types can't
>> >>> resize online and need to be restarted)
>> >>> 5. Update the database
>> >>>
>> >>> You can check #3 looking at the disks themselves on storage to see if
>> >>> they've grown. You can check #4 by restarting the VM to see if it
>> >>> picks up the change.
>> >>>
>> >>> It may be that libvirt was unable to inform the VM of the change (for
>> >>> example if you haven't upgraded to a supported version of Ubuntu or
>> >>> CentOS and it has an old libvirt that doesn't support volBlockResize).
>> >>>  The way to know for sure is stop/start the VM if you can.
>> >>>
>> >>> Look at those two things and let us know
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Indra Pramana <in...@sg.or.id> wrote:
>> >>>> Dear all,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> After upgrading to 4.2.0, I tried to resize a data disk of a VM
>> >> instance
>> >>>> from 20 GB to 60 GB, through the Cloudstack GUI. The UI reports that
>> >> the
>> >>>> resize was successful, and that the data disk is now showing 60 GB
>> >>> instead
>> >>>> of 20 GB. However, when I check the actual disk on the VM, it seems
>> >> that
>> >>>> it's still 20 GB.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Any reason what might have been the cause of the problem? I even
>> tried
>> >> to
>> >>>> re-partition it to see if the size changed, but it wasn't and still
>> at
>> >> 20
>> >>>> GB. Which logs I need to look into?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Any help on this is greatly appreciated.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to